From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
"Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@intel.com>,
"Ciechanowski, Ed" <ed.ciechanowski@intel.com>,
Ignacy Kasperowicz <ignacy.kasperowicz@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [mdadm PATCH 0/2] two 3.1.3 regression fixes (incremental assembly)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:22:47 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100812112247.180c24c4@notabene> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C61E37E.4060403@intel.com>
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:40:46 -0700
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> On 8/10/2010 9:46 AM, Williams, Dan J wrote:
> > Hi Neil,
> >
> > The mdadm -I --no-degraded option needs to be acceptable for some time
> > to come, do you have a policy for when deprecated options can be scheduled for
> > removal? The error code for -I shall be zero in the 'not enough' case to
> > restore the correct and established pre-3.1.3 behavior.
> >
> > Also available via git:
> >
> > git://github.com/djbw/mdadm.git master
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Dan Williams (2):
> > Incremental: return success in 'container not enough' case
> > Incremental: accept '--no-degraded' as a deprecated option
>
> Note, both of these should have been tagged:
>
> Reported-by: Ignacy Kasperowicz <ignacy.kasperowicz@intel.com>
>
> If you take the patches directly.
Thanks,
I've taken both and added that line.
I'm beginning to think we should treat 3.1.3 like an -rc and do a 3.1.4 soon
with all these little fix-ups...
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-12 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-10 16:46 [mdadm PATCH 0/2] two 3.1.3 regression fixes (incremental assembly) Dan Williams
2010-08-10 16:46 ` [mdadm PATCH 1/2] Incremental: return success in 'container not enough' case Dan Williams
2010-08-10 16:46 ` [mdadm PATCH 2/2] Incremental: accept '--no-degraded' as a deprecated option Dan Williams
2010-08-10 23:40 ` [mdadm PATCH 0/2] two 3.1.3 regression fixes (incremental assembly) Dan Williams
2010-08-12 1:22 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2010-08-12 1:47 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100812112247.180c24c4@notabene \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=Marcin.Labun@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
--cc=ignacy.kasperowicz@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).