From: "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux@horizon.com
Subject: 3-way mirrors
Date: 7 Sep 2010 10:19:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100907141904.3696.qmail@science.horizon.com> (raw)
After some frustration with RAID-5 finding mismatches and not being
able to figure out which drive has the problem, I'm setting up a rather
intricate 5-way mirrored (x 2-way striped) system.
The intention is that 3 copies will be on line at any time (dropping to
2 in case of disk failure), while copies 4 and 5 will be kept off-site.
Occasionally one will come in, be re-synced, and then removed again.
(The file system can be quiesced briefly to permit a clean split.)
Anyway, one nice property of a 2-drive redundancy (3+-way mirror or
RAID-6) is error detection: in case of a mismatch, it's possible to
finger the offending drive.
My understanding of the current code is that it just copies one mirror
(the first readable?) to the others. Does someone have a patch to vote
on the data? If not, can someone point me at the relevant bit of code
and orient me enough that I can create it?
(The other thing I'd love is a more advanced sync_action that can accept a
block number found by "check" as a parameter to "repair" so I don't have
to wait while the array is re-scanned. Um... I suppose this depends on
a local patch I have that logs the sector numbers of mismatches.)
Another thing I'm a bit worried about is the kernel's tendency to
add drives in the lowest-numbered open slot in a RAID. When used in
multiply-mirrored RAID-10, this tends to fill up the first stripe hallf
before starting on the second.
I'm worried that someone not paying attention will --add rather than
--re-add the off-site backup drives and create mirrors 4 and 5 of
the first stripe half, thus producing an incomplete backup.
Any suggestions on how to mitigate this risk? And if it happens,
how do I recover? Is there a way to force a drive to be added
as 9/10, even if 5/10 is currently empty?
Thank you very much!
next reply other threads:[~2010-09-07 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-07 14:19 George Spelvin [this message]
2010-09-07 16:07 ` 3-way mirrors Iordan Iordanov
2010-09-07 18:49 ` George Spelvin
2010-09-07 19:55 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2010-09-07 18:31 ` Aryeh Gregor
2010-09-07 19:02 ` George Spelvin
2010-09-08 22:28 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-09-07 22:01 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-08 1:33 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-08 14:52 ` George Spelvin
2010-09-08 23:04 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-08 9:40 ` RAID mismatches (and reporting thereof) Tim Small
2010-09-08 12:35 ` George Spelvin
2010-09-28 16:42 ` 3-way mirrors Tim Small
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-08 3:58 Michael Sallaway
2010-09-08 4:16 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-08 5:45 Michael Sallaway
2010-09-08 6:02 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-08 6:16 Michael Sallaway
2010-09-08 6:40 ` Neil Brown
2010-09-08 9:06 ` Tim Small
2010-09-08 7:01 Michael Sallaway
2010-09-08 9:11 ` Tim Small
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100907141904.3696.qmail@science.horizon.com \
--to=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).