linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Endian issue assembling arrays
@ 2010-07-28 20:53 Doug Nazar
  2010-09-16 11:03 ` Neil Brown
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Doug Nazar @ 2010-07-28 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 277 bytes --]

  Came across this while testing some updates to GRUB's RAID support.

Assembling a RAID1 array on a PPC box results in the following warning:

mdadm: device 1 in /dev/md/0 has wrong state in superblock, but 
/dev/sdb2 seems ok
mdadm: /dev/md/0 has been started with 2


Doug


[-- Attachment #2: mdadm-assemble-roles-endian-fix.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 460 bytes --]

--- mdadm-3.1.2/super1.c	2010-03-09 18:26:44.000000000 -0500
+++ mdadm-3.1.2.dev/super1.c	2010-07-28 16:41:41.000000000 -0400
@@ -673,10 +673,10 @@
 		int d = info->disk.number;
 		int want;
 		if (info->disk.state == 6)
-			want = __cpu_to_le32(info->disk.raid_disk);
+			want = info->disk.raid_disk;
 		else
 			want = 0xFFFF;
-		if (sb->dev_roles[d] != want) {
+		if (__le16_to_cpu(sb->dev_roles[d]) != want) {
 			sb->dev_roles[d] = want;
 			rv = 1;
 		}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Endian issue assembling arrays
  2010-07-28 20:53 Endian issue assembling arrays Doug Nazar
@ 2010-09-16 11:03 ` Neil Brown
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2010-09-16 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Doug Nazar; +Cc: linux-raid

On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:53:47 -0400
Doug Nazar <nazard.michi@gmail.com> wrote:

>   Came across this while testing some updates to GRUB's RAID support.
> 
> Assembling a RAID1 array on a PPC box results in the following warning:
> 
> mdadm: device 1 in /dev/md/0 has wrong state in superblock, but 
> /dev/sdb2 seems ok
> mdadm: /dev/md/0 has been started with 2
> 
> 
> Doug
> 

Thanks for the report and the more recent reminder.

Your patch :

--- mdadm-3.1.2/super1.c	2010-03-09 18:26:44.000000000 -0500
+++ mdadm-3.1.2.dev/super1.c	2010-07-28 16:41:41.000000000 -0400
@@ -673,10 +673,10 @@
 		int d = info->disk.number;
 		int want;
 		if (info->disk.state == 6)
-			want = __cpu_to_le32(info->disk.raid_disk);
+			want = info->disk.raid_disk;
 		else
 			want = 0xFFFF;
-		if (sb->dev_roles[d] != want) {
+		if (__le16_to_cpu(sb->dev_roles[d]) != want) {
 			sb->dev_roles[d] = want;
 			rv = 1;
 		}


isn't quite right.  The assignment needs a conversion too.

I have committed the following to
  http://neil.brown.name/git/mdadm/

Thanks a lot,
NeilBrown

commit a2ce5a1af19e5dcfd59cad117c0e9fccabce7322
Author: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date:   Thu Sep 16 20:58:31 2010 +1000

    Fix byte-order conversion in update_super1("assemble")
    
    This code is wrong is several ways, and failed on big-endian machines.
    Put in correct endian coversions: 'want' is cpu-order, dev_roles[] is little-endian,
    16 bit.
    
    Reported-by: Doug Nazar <nazard.michi@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
index 01473d1..0eb0323 100644
--- a/super1.c
+++ b/super1.c
@@ -673,11 +673,11 @@ static int update_super1(struct supertype *st, struct mdinfo *info,
 		int d = info->disk.number;
 		int want;
 		if (info->disk.state == 6)
-			want = __cpu_to_le32(info->disk.raid_disk);
+			want = info->disk.raid_disk;
 		else
 			want = 0xFFFF;
-		if (sb->dev_roles[d] != want) {
-			sb->dev_roles[d] = want;
+		if (sb->dev_roles[d] != __cpu_to_le16(want)) {
+			sb->dev_roles[d] = __cpu_to_le16(want);
 			rv = 1;
 		}
 	}

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-16 11:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-28 20:53 Endian issue assembling arrays Doug Nazar
2010-09-16 11:03 ` Neil Brown

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).