* Endian issue assembling arrays
@ 2010-07-28 20:53 Doug Nazar
2010-09-16 11:03 ` Neil Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Doug Nazar @ 2010-07-28 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 277 bytes --]
Came across this while testing some updates to GRUB's RAID support.
Assembling a RAID1 array on a PPC box results in the following warning:
mdadm: device 1 in /dev/md/0 has wrong state in superblock, but
/dev/sdb2 seems ok
mdadm: /dev/md/0 has been started with 2
Doug
[-- Attachment #2: mdadm-assemble-roles-endian-fix.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 460 bytes --]
--- mdadm-3.1.2/super1.c 2010-03-09 18:26:44.000000000 -0500
+++ mdadm-3.1.2.dev/super1.c 2010-07-28 16:41:41.000000000 -0400
@@ -673,10 +673,10 @@
int d = info->disk.number;
int want;
if (info->disk.state == 6)
- want = __cpu_to_le32(info->disk.raid_disk);
+ want = info->disk.raid_disk;
else
want = 0xFFFF;
- if (sb->dev_roles[d] != want) {
+ if (__le16_to_cpu(sb->dev_roles[d]) != want) {
sb->dev_roles[d] = want;
rv = 1;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Endian issue assembling arrays
2010-07-28 20:53 Endian issue assembling arrays Doug Nazar
@ 2010-09-16 11:03 ` Neil Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2010-09-16 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Doug Nazar; +Cc: linux-raid
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:53:47 -0400
Doug Nazar <nazard.michi@gmail.com> wrote:
> Came across this while testing some updates to GRUB's RAID support.
>
> Assembling a RAID1 array on a PPC box results in the following warning:
>
> mdadm: device 1 in /dev/md/0 has wrong state in superblock, but
> /dev/sdb2 seems ok
> mdadm: /dev/md/0 has been started with 2
>
>
> Doug
>
Thanks for the report and the more recent reminder.
Your patch :
--- mdadm-3.1.2/super1.c 2010-03-09 18:26:44.000000000 -0500
+++ mdadm-3.1.2.dev/super1.c 2010-07-28 16:41:41.000000000 -0400
@@ -673,10 +673,10 @@
int d = info->disk.number;
int want;
if (info->disk.state == 6)
- want = __cpu_to_le32(info->disk.raid_disk);
+ want = info->disk.raid_disk;
else
want = 0xFFFF;
- if (sb->dev_roles[d] != want) {
+ if (__le16_to_cpu(sb->dev_roles[d]) != want) {
sb->dev_roles[d] = want;
rv = 1;
}
isn't quite right. The assignment needs a conversion too.
I have committed the following to
http://neil.brown.name/git/mdadm/
Thanks a lot,
NeilBrown
commit a2ce5a1af19e5dcfd59cad117c0e9fccabce7322
Author: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Thu Sep 16 20:58:31 2010 +1000
Fix byte-order conversion in update_super1("assemble")
This code is wrong is several ways, and failed on big-endian machines.
Put in correct endian coversions: 'want' is cpu-order, dev_roles[] is little-endian,
16 bit.
Reported-by: Doug Nazar <nazard.michi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
index 01473d1..0eb0323 100644
--- a/super1.c
+++ b/super1.c
@@ -673,11 +673,11 @@ static int update_super1(struct supertype *st, struct mdinfo *info,
int d = info->disk.number;
int want;
if (info->disk.state == 6)
- want = __cpu_to_le32(info->disk.raid_disk);
+ want = info->disk.raid_disk;
else
want = 0xFFFF;
- if (sb->dev_roles[d] != want) {
- sb->dev_roles[d] = want;
+ if (sb->dev_roles[d] != __cpu_to_le16(want)) {
+ sb->dev_roles[d] = __cpu_to_le16(want);
rv = 1;
}
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-16 11:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-28 20:53 Endian issue assembling arrays Doug Nazar
2010-09-16 11:03 ` Neil Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).