From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Cracauer Subject: Re: Superblock V 1.2 Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:16:46 -0500 Message-ID: <20101115161646.GA38828@cons.org> References: <20101107191507.GA31052@cons.org> <20101107210852.GA77472@cons.org> <4CD71C77.4030400@anonymous.org.uk> <20101109163512.GA15649@cons.org> <4CD98021.2060501@anonymous.org.uk> <20101115121158.20e2e53e@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101115121158.20e2e53e@notabene.brown> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Neil Brown Cc: John Robinson , Martin Cracauer , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Neil Brown wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:11:58PM +1100: > > When mdadm does auto-assemble an array that doesn't obviously belong to this > host, it tries to be careful and assembles it 'read-auto', which means that > it is completely read-only until you try to write to the array. So no > recovery or resync happens. > Once you write to the array, md assumes that you are happy to have the array > assembled on this device, and allows any resync etc to start. Speaking of which, are there any plans to do a true readonly mode? I missed that quite a few times. Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer/