From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: Devel 3.2 branch issues Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:59:42 +1100 Message-ID: <20101129095942.258c5317@notabene.brown> References: <20101123115213.3664ec27@notabene.brown> <20101125190152.01d61cbd@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Czarnowska, Anna" Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" , "Neubauer, Wojciech" , "Williams, Dan J" , "Ciechanowski, Ed" , "Labun, Marcin" , "Hawrylewicz Czarnowski, Przemyslaw" List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 18:23:34 +0000 "Czarnowska, Anna" wrote: > > Well, this didn't help. > > In the set of tests I have just posted even the basic ones fail for > > imsm. > > For native there are still some problems with tests: > > 5c - spare not moved to degraded array in the same domain. This is > > really basic test with 4 arrays instead of 2. > > 9 - spare moved between different metadata arrays > > 13 - spare moved despite action=include which doesn't allow migration > > > > Test9 run in scan mode generates a segmentation fault. > > > > I will have a look at this in debugger and give you more info on the > > reasons later on. > > > > Anna > > After applying yesterday's fixes test5 and test9 don't fail any more for native. > > Test6 often fails because Monitor keeps removing and re-adding spare > that is too small to add to degraded array. Test fails when we see it removed. > > I have prepared few further fixes to address possible problems with Monitor > as described in each patch. Thanks for these patches and more particularly for all the testing effort, finding and fixing my bugs! I have applied them all. NeilBrown > > Spare migration works now also for imsm. (test12 and 13 still fail). > Test12 - two spares are taken when just one needed. > Test13 - action=include so spare should not be moved > > Scan mode still needs to be investigated. > > Anna