From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keld =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F8rn?= Simonsen Subject: Re: LVM over RAID, or plain disks? A:"Yes" = best of both worlds? Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:29:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20101129152916.GB13310@www2.open-std.org> References: <2D.98.07087.690A2FC4@cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: hansbkk@gmail.com Cc: Leslie Rhorer , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-lvm@redhat.com List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 06:01:11PM +0700, hansbkk@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Leslie Rhorer = wrote: > >> - I am not at this point overly concerned about performance issues= - > >> reliability/redundancy and ease of recovery are my main priorities= =2E > > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0In that case, I'm not sure about your desire for the= additional > > complexity. =A0Someone else suggested RAID6, which from an operatio= nal > > standpoint is much simpler. =A0The main reason, it seems to me, for= the more > > complex topologies would be enhancing perfromance. >=20 > I can see how RAID6 is simpler than RAID10, but compared to RAID1? Hmm, does not compute by me. RAID1 and RAID10 are the same in complexit= y, RAID10 is just a modern RAID1, and should actually have been called RAID1. best regards keld -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html