From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Janek Kozicki <janek_listy@wp.pl>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: growing md2, do I need three reboots?
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:25:47 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101203122547.48637340@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101202165203.4fbc240f@atak.bl.pg.gda.pl>
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:52:03 +0100 Janek Kozicki <janek_listy@wp.pl> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my /dev/md2 uses superblock 1.0, which is stored at the end of
> device. Therefore I suppose that this approach of growing it isn't
> going to work:
>
> #Alter the partition tables, to make /dev/sd[abc]2 have new size:
> fdisk /dev/sda
> fdisk /dev/sdb
> fdisk /dev/sdc
>
> #reboot (make kernel read new partition table)
>
> #then, grow the raid1 /dev/md1
> mdadm --grow /dev/md2 --size=max
>
> #and finaly, grow the ext2 (or ext3) fs on /dev/md1
> resize2fs /dev/md1
>
> Because in this way, after rebooting, /dev/md2 won't be found - the
> superblock won't be in the correct place.
>
> So, I would need to remove each of them from the array, resize
> partition, then add it back. Thus needing three reboots, since I can
> remove only one device at a time (the same HDDs have also partitions
> belonging to root raid1 array), which must be always up & running.
>
> I can afford reboots, no problem here, but isn't there some simpler way?
Yes, there is a simpler way, but no: it isn't going to work anyway.
You cannot 'grow' a RAID10 array at all - sorry. It is sufficiently complex
that it needs quite a bit of time to design, code, and test. And I haven't
had that time yet.
But if you could resize a RAID10 array, this is what I would do:
1/ For each devices (sda, sdb, sdc)
- fail and remove each partition from the respective array.
- run 'kpartx -a /dev/sdX'. This will create partitions in
/dev/mapper/ with the same names.
- --re-add these partitions to the arrays. The presence of a
write-intent-bitmap will mean that resync is almost instant.
2/ Use fdisk to change the partition tables.
3/ run 'kpartx -a /dev/sdX' again on each device. This will change the
partitions even while they are active.
4/ For the partitions which have changed size, find the matching
/dev/md2/md/dev-dm0X/size
and
echo 0 > /dev/md2/md/dev-dm-X/size
This will cause md to relocate the metadata to the new end of the device.
Not that these partitions (created by kpartx) are device-mapper partitions
so have names like 'dm-0' and 'dm-1'.
5/ mdadm -G /dev/md2 --size max
This bit unfortunately won't work.
NeilBrown
>
>
> below is my raid layout, I need to grow md2 by few spare gigabytes
> left at the end of /dev/sd[abc].
>
> kernel 2.6.29 (impossible to upgrade at the moment).
>
> Personalities : [raid0] [raid1] [raid10]
> md2 : active raid10 sda2[0] sdc2[2] sdb2[1]
> 185381376 blocks super 1.0 512K chunks 2 far-copies [3/3] [UUU]
> bitmap: 1/6 pages [4KB], 16384KB chunk
>
> md1 : active raid1 sdc1[2](W) sdb1[3](W)
> 9767416 blocks super 1.0 [2/2] [UU]
> bitmap: 1/150 pages [4KB], 32KB chunk
>
> md0 : active raid1 sde1[0] sdd1[2] sda1[1]
> 9767424 blocks [3/3] [UUU]
> bitmap: 1/150 pages [4KB], 32KB chunk
>
> unused devices: <none>
> atak:/home/janek# mdadm -D /dev/md2
> /dev/md2:
> Version : 1.0
> Creation Time : Thu Sep 2 11:47:39 2010
> Raid Level : raid10
> Array Size : 185381376 (176.79 GiB 189.83 GB)
> Used Dev Size : 123587584 (117.86 GiB 126.55 GB)
> Raid Devices : 3
> Total Devices : 3
> Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>
> Intent Bitmap : Internal
>
> Update Time : Thu Dec 2 16:41:02 2010
> State : active
> Active Devices : 3
> Working Devices : 3
> Failed Devices : 0
> Spare Devices : 0
>
> Layout : far=2
> Chunk Size : 512K
>
> Name : atak:2 (local to host atak)
> UUID : f2a75dbe:5ac91a1f:c09da3c0:f6f69c9c
> Events : 28
>
> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
> 0 8 2 0 active sync /dev/sda2
> 1 8 18 1 active sync /dev/sdb2
> 2 8 34 2 active sync /dev/sdc2
>
> best regards
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-03 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-02 15:52 growing md2, do I need three reboots? Janek Kozicki
2010-12-03 1:25 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2010-12-03 9:39 ` Janek Kozicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101203122547.48637340@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=janek_listy@wp.pl \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox