From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
ed.ciechanowski@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] FIX: Honor !reshape state on wait_reshape() entry
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 15:11:59 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101203151159.742802c2@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101202081950.4639.14389.stgit@gklab-170-024.igk.intel.com>
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:19:51 +0100 Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com> wrote:
> When wait_reshape() function starts it can occurs that reshape is finished already,
> before wait_reshape() start. This can lead to wait for change state inside this function for a long time.
> To avoid this before wait we should test if finish conditions are not reached already.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
> ---
>
> Grow.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Grow.c b/Grow.c
> index 96c9526..24c5c39 100644
> --- a/Grow.c
> +++ b/Grow.c
> @@ -548,17 +548,22 @@ static void wait_reshape(struct mdinfo *sra)
> int fd = sysfs_get_fd(sra, NULL, "sync_action");
> char action[20];
>
> - do {
> + if (fd < 0)
> + return;
> +
> + if (sysfs_fd_get_str(fd, action, 20) < 0) {
> + close(fd);
> + return;
> + }
> + while (strncmp(action, "reshape", 7) == 0) {
> fd_set rfds;
> FD_ZERO(&rfds);
> FD_SET(fd, &rfds);
> select(fd+1, NULL, NULL, &rfds, NULL);
> -
> - if (sysfs_fd_get_str(fd, action, 20) < 0) {
> - close(fd);
> - return;
> - }
> - } while (strncmp(action, "reshape", 7) == 0);
> + if (sysfs_fd_get_str(fd, action, 20) < 0)
> + break;
> + }
> + close(fd);
> }
>
> static int reshape_super(struct supertype *st, long long size, int level,
Thanks for this fix. There is room to tidy the code up even more. This is
what I have applied.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
commit 92a19f1a78e040202e3d067960e3b1ecc8162881
Author: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Date: Fri Dec 3 15:10:20 2010 +1100
FIX: Honor !reshape state on wait_reshape() entry
When wait_reshape() function starts it can occurs that reshape is
finished already, before wait_reshape() start. This can lead to wait
for change state inside this function for a long time. To avoid this
before wait we should test if finish conditions are not reached
already.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
diff --git a/Grow.c b/Grow.c
index c408a92..3322cf7 100644
--- a/Grow.c
+++ b/Grow.c
@@ -548,17 +548,17 @@ static void wait_reshape(struct mdinfo *sra)
int fd = sysfs_get_fd(sra, NULL, "sync_action");
char action[20];
- do {
+ if (fd < 0)
+ return;
+
+ while (sysfs_fd_get_str(fd, action, 20) > 0 &&
+ strncmp(action, "reshape", 7) == 0) {
fd_set rfds;
FD_ZERO(&rfds);
FD_SET(fd, &rfds);
select(fd+1, NULL, NULL, &rfds, NULL);
-
- if (sysfs_fd_get_str(fd, action, 20) < 0) {
- close(fd);
- return;
- }
- } while (strncmp(action, "reshape", 7) == 0);
+ }
+ close(fd);
}
static int reshape_super(struct supertype *st, long long size, int level,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-03 4:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-02 8:18 [PATCH 00/10] Pre-migration patch series Adam Kwolek
2010-12-02 8:18 ` [PATCH 01/10] FIX: Cannot exit monitor after takeover Adam Kwolek
2010-12-02 8:18 ` [PATCH 02/10] FIX: Problem with removing array " Adam Kwolek
2010-12-03 3:46 ` Neil Brown
2010-12-02 8:19 ` [PATCH 03/10] FIX: Add error code for raid_disks set Adam Kwolek
2010-12-02 18:56 ` Dan Williams
2010-12-02 8:19 ` [PATCH 04/10] Add support to skip slot configuration Adam Kwolek
2010-12-02 8:19 ` [PATCH 05/10] Add spares to raid0 array using takeover Adam Kwolek
2010-12-03 3:52 ` Neil Brown
2010-12-02 8:19 ` [PATCH 06/10] FIX: open backup file for reshape as function Adam Kwolek
2010-12-03 4:01 ` Neil Brown
2010-12-02 8:19 ` [PATCH 07/10] FIX: Do not use layout for raid4 and raid0 while geo map computing Adam Kwolek
2010-12-02 8:19 ` [PATCH 08/10] FIX: sync_completed_fd handler has to be closed Adam Kwolek
2010-12-02 8:19 ` [PATCH 09/10] FIX: Honor !reshape state on wait_reshape() entry Adam Kwolek
2010-12-03 4:11 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2010-12-02 8:19 ` [PATCH 10/10] FIX: wait_backup() sometimes hungs Adam Kwolek
2010-12-03 4:16 ` Neil Brown
2010-12-03 7:45 ` Kwolek, Adam
2010-12-03 10:35 ` Neil Brown
2010-12-03 4:19 ` [PATCH 00/10] Pre-migration patch series Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101203151159.742802c2@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=adam.kwolek@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).