From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Mamedov Subject: Re: Debugging a strange array corruption Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:42:31 +0500 Message-ID: <20101214144231.0493d534@natsu> References: <4D07265F.8060109@wasp.net.au> <20101214142246.20c927e1@natsu> <4D073AF1.7090709@wasp.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/S4tV7k4fTWJShj0goxlNmDg"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4D073AF1.7090709@wasp.net.au> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Brad Campbell Cc: RAID Linux List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/S4tV7k4fTWJShj0goxlNmDg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:37:53 +0800 Brad Campbell wrote: > And in the prior incarnation I was only using 1 port on that controller so > the problem would never have manifested itself. Thanks, at least I have > something to try. To add another idea to my previous reply, it should be pretty easy to test = for the presence of this particular problem by running your dd+md5sum test on j= ust the two physical disks which are plugged into that controller, starting the tests simultaneously on both disks (in two terminal windows). See if you get varying sums over several runs that way. --=20 With respect, Roman --Sig_/S4tV7k4fTWJShj0goxlNmDg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk0HPAcACgkQTLKSvz+PZwgw1gCbB8TG9PgTDYkcEr8sjBVNYBFH ZIMAn3rf6PkgF/qXJgoefkhPbG5JvZRN =t9uM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/S4tV7k4fTWJShj0goxlNmDg--