From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Mamedov Subject: Re: integrity verification on raid-5? Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:30:35 +0500 Message-ID: <20101218153035.5c134e06@natsu> References: <4D0BD140.6040205@feystorm.net> <20101217212436.GA11425@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/pMLEs1w7BTWjCNgF7lQbmVR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101217212436.GA11425@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Robin Hill Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/pMLEs1w7BTWjCNgF7lQbmVR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:24:37 +0000 Robin Hill wrote: =20 > Currently, there's no easy way to find out what file(s) are affected by > the mismatches though. That's why it is also a good idea to keep around file-level checksums in ea= ch directory (especially if you store a lot of files which shouldn't ever chan= ge, like audio or video collections), using CFV - http://cfv.sourceforge.net/ --=20 With respect, Roman --Sig_/pMLEs1w7BTWjCNgF7lQbmVR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk0MjUsACgkQTLKSvz+PZwiMXQCffzCgI+sLLYE9pNTFazM5j4nH hSsAoIZ9ceDcY1gQRt4RKQcPMpuaJeq1 =KAAI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/pMLEs1w7BTWjCNgF7lQbmVR--