From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Snitzer Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] dm-raid (raid456) target Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 17:36:29 -0500 Message-ID: <20110105223628.GA13164@redhat.com> References: <1292899065-31943-1-git-send-email-snitzer@redhat.com> <20101221141443.5aea0b12@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101221141443.5aea0b12@notabene.brown> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Neil Brown Cc: jbrassow@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Mon, Dec 20 2010 at 10:14pm -0500, Neil Brown wrote: > On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:37:37 -0500 Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > I reviewed all patches and adjusted patch headers in preparation for > > inclusion in Alasdair's tree (upstream target being v2.6.38). The 2 > > md/bitmap changes can obviously go through Neil's MD tree if that is > > preferred. > > > > - added Copyright to the top of dm-raid.c > > - fixed drivers/md/Kconfig so that DM_RAID will select MD_RAID456 > > - removed unused 'conf' variable in raid_status() > > - few misc style and whitespace changes > > > > Neil, > > Hopefully you're comfortable with the authorship of most of these > > patches still being attributed to you (despite Jon's changes to your > > original patches). > > > > Please advise, thanks! > > I haven't had a chance to have a proper look yet, and I'm about to go on > leave for a couple of weeks. > I'm probably happy with the authorship remaining as-is, but I reserve the > right to change my mind (about anything) once I've had a chance to have a > proper look. Hi Neil, Please advise on how you'd like things to proceed with this initial 8 patch set. Ideally we'd get them in to linux-next now and ultimately 2.6.38 before the merge window closes. Thanks, Mike