linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Optimize RAID0 for max IOPS?
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:41:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110125184115.1119FB187@gemini.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110125171017.GA24921@infradead.org>

Dear Christoph,

In message <20110125171017.GA24921@infradead.org> you wrote:
>
> > There may be 20...50 millions of files, or more. 65% of the files are
> > smaller than 4 kB; 80% are smaller than 8 kB; 90% are smaller than 16
> > kB; 98.4% are smaller than 64 kB.
> 
> I don't think you even want a RAID0 in that case.  For small IOPs
> you're much better off with a simple concatenation of devices.

What exactly do you mean by "conatenation"? LVM striping?
At least the discussion here does not show any significant advantages
for this concept:
http://groups.google.com/group/ubuntu-user-community/web/pick-your-pleasure-raid-0-mdadm-striping-or-lvm-striping

> > Should I do anything different to acchive maximum performance?
> 
> Make sure to disable the disk write caches and if not using the newest
> kernel also mount the filesystem with -o nobarrier.  With lots of small
> I/Os and metadata intensive workloads that's usually a lot faster.

Tests if done recently indicate that on the other hand nobarrier causes
a serious degradation of read and write performance (down to some 40%
of the values before).

> Also if you have a lot of log traffic an external log devices will
> help a lot.  It's doesn't need to be larger, but it will keep the
> amount of seeks on the other devices down.

Understood, thanks.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes.
                                -- Dr. Warren Jackson, Director, UTCS

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-25 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-18 21:01 Optimize RAID0 for max IOPS? Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-18 22:18 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-01-19  7:04   ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-18 23:15 ` Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner
2011-01-19  0:05   ` Roberto Spadim
2011-01-19  7:11     ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-19  8:18       ` Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner
2011-01-19  8:29         ` Jaap Crezee
2011-01-19  9:32           ` Jan Kasprzak
2011-01-19  7:10   ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-19 19:21   ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-19 19:50     ` Roberto Spadim
2011-01-19 22:36       ` Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner
2011-01-19 23:09         ` Roberto Spadim
2011-01-19 23:18           ` Roberto Spadim
2011-01-20  2:48             ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-01-20  3:53               ` Roberto Spadim
2011-01-21 19:34             ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-21 20:03               ` Roberto Spadim
2011-01-21 20:04                 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-01-24 14:40     ` CoolCold
2011-01-24 15:25       ` Justin Piszcz
2011-01-24 20:48         ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-24 21:57         ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-24 23:03           ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-25  7:39             ` Emmanuel Florac
2011-01-25  8:36               ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-25 12:45                 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-25 12:51                   ` Emmanuel Florac
2011-01-24 20:43       ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-25 17:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-25 18:41   ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2011-01-25 21:35     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-26  7:16       ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-26  8:32         ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-26  8:42           ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-01-26  9:38         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-26  9:41           ` CoolCold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110125184115.1119FB187@gemini.denx.de \
    --to=wd@denx.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).