From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
Subject: Re: Performance question, RAID5
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:44:44 +0500
Message-ID: <20110130094444.68288b0e@natsu>
References: <AANLkTimXp-vGP8fb2Y-2EiaGxj+H6UJ9DfjtYMVDhDri@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=SbAM3BXxjH6Mvcn-Tw4b0FYyLjLFqSGuxY1fk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik4MGS7V7ePBgbk+KW-FcBBV7MuYgB7n29RRXF=@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/09v96F5JO_YYRJCr7ex2Fwr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik4MGS7V7ePBgbk+KW-FcBBV7MuYgB7n29RRXF=@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Mathias =?UTF-8?B?QnVyw6lu?= <mathias.buren@gmail.com>
Cc: CoolCold <coolthecold@gmail.com>, Linux-RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

--Sig_/09v96F5JO_YYRJCr7ex2Fwr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:18:34 +0000
Mathias Bur=C3=A9n <mathias.buren@gmail.com> wrote:

> I ran the benchmark found on the page (except for writes); results:

That's kinda unfortunate, as stripe_cache_size only (or mostly) affects wri=
tes.

--=20
With respect,
Roman

--Sig_/09v96F5JO_YYRJCr7ex2Fwr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk1E7LwACgkQTLKSvz+PZwijXwCeLN7aMEyFVrSR5Go2pOeEQGli
ojIAnRKBpRBBdZbzYMhh+f0te7wb3R+D
=Ms3w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/09v96F5JO_YYRJCr7ex2Fwr--