linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	ed.ciechanowski@intel.com, wojciech.neubauer@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] imsm: FIX: array size is wrong
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:41:18 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110203174118.5879e8be@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110201134912.13398.64773.stgit@gklab-128-013.igk.intel.com>

On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:49:12 +0100 Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com> wrote:

> Calculation of size is almost ok, except concept of blocks.
> Size for setting in md has to be divided by 2 to be correct.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
> ---
> 
>  super-intel.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/super-intel.c b/super-intel.c
> index ee0d9c4..42f7065 100644
> --- a/super-intel.c
> +++ b/super-intel.c
> @@ -5187,7 +5187,7 @@ static int imsm_set_array_state(struct active_array *a, int consistent)
>  					<< SECT_PER_MB_SHIFT;
>  				dev->size_low = __cpu_to_le32((__u32) array_blocks);
>  				dev->size_high = __cpu_to_le32((__u32) (array_blocks >> 32));
> -				a->info.custom_array_size = array_blocks;
> +				a->info.custom_array_size = array_blocks/2;
>  				a->check_reshape = 1; /* encourage manager to update
>  						       * array size
>  						       */
> 


I think the original code is correct.
custom_array_size is measured in sectors.
In grow.c we divide by 2 before comparing with the "array_size" sysfs
attribute which is measured in kilobytes.
Also in getinfo_super_imsm_volume, custom_array_size is set from
the same size_low/size_high fields as used here.

However in manage_member custom_array_size is compared directly
with "array_size" which is wrong and is probably causing whatever
problem you experienced.

So I'll change this patch to fix that up instead - see below.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

commit 02eedb57aa0c6f7fdeda1b612f35545ab4eee58f
Author: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Date:   Thu Feb 3 17:40:18 2011 +1100

    imsm: FIX: array size is wrong
    
    Calculation of size is almost ok, except concept of blocks.
    Size for setting in md has to be divided by 2 to be correct.
    
    Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

diff --git a/managemon.c b/managemon.c
index 63c9705..6001f6a 100644
--- a/managemon.c
+++ b/managemon.c
@@ -549,9 +549,9 @@ static void manage_member(struct mdstat_ent *mdstat,
 			disk_init_and_add(newd, d, newa);
 		}
 		if (sysfs_get_ll(info, NULL, "array_size", &array_size) == 0
-		    && a->info.custom_array_size > array_size) {
+		    && a->info.custom_array_size > array_size*2) {
 			sysfs_set_num(info, NULL, "array_size",
-				      a->info.custom_array_size);
+				      a->info.custom_array_size/2);
 		}
 	out2:
 		sysfs_free(info);

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-03  6:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-01 13:48 [PATCH 0/8] Set of fixes for expansion Adam Kwolek
2011-02-01 13:49 ` [PATCH 1/8] FIX: Last checkpoint is not set Adam Kwolek
2011-02-01 13:49 ` [PATCH 2/8] imsm: FIX: array size is wrong Adam Kwolek
2011-02-03  6:41   ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-02-03  9:56     ` Kwolek, Adam
2011-02-01 13:49 ` [PATCH 3/8] imsm: FIX: Size is already set in metadata Adam Kwolek
2011-02-03  6:45   ` NeilBrown
2011-02-03  9:52     ` Kwolek, Adam
2011-02-03 10:42       ` NeilBrown
2011-02-01 13:49 ` [PATCH 4/8] imsm: FIX: put expansion finalization in to one place Adam Kwolek
2011-02-01 13:49 ` [PATCH 5/8] imsm: fix: imsm_num_data_members() can return error Adam Kwolek
2011-02-01 13:49 ` [PATCH 6/8] FIX: Do not set array size after reshape in mdadm Adam Kwolek
2011-02-03  6:56   ` NeilBrown
2011-02-03 10:08     ` Kwolek, Adam
2011-02-03 10:44       ` NeilBrown
2011-02-01 13:49 ` [PATCH 7/8] imsm: FIX: Debug strings cleanup Adam Kwolek
2011-02-01 13:50 ` [PATCH 8/8] imsm: move common code for array size calculation to function Adam Kwolek
2011-02-03  7:22 ` [PATCH 0/8] Set of fixes for expansion NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110203174118.5879e8be@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=adam.kwolek@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wojciech.neubauer@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).