From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@eyal.emu.id.au>
Cc: linux-raid list <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Q re sync_completed
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:32:01 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110213153201.7ceaea0d@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D571F67.30809@eyal.emu.id.au>
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:01:43 +1100 Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@eyal.emu.id.au>
wrote:
> I have scripts that do a raid check, then proceed to identify any files
> affected. I then manually deal with these.
>
> I have a few issues with this RADI6 setup, here is one.
>
> I am setting sync_min and sync_max, start a check and wait for sync_completed
> to equal sync_max.
>
> I assumed that when equal it means that this address was "completed". After
> doing this for a while I observed that this is probably not the case.
>
> My expectation is that sync_completed has 'none' until it finished a chunk.
> It then updates it with later completed ones. When it reaches sync_max
> it pauses, and I then raise sync_max for the next area. This way I can
> tell where a mismatch occurs. If sync_completed is set before a chunk
> is completed then I may fetch mismatch_cnt too early (while the last
> chunk is still being checked). This seems to be the case.
>
> Q: Is this the case?
The intention of sync_completed is that it is only updated after
sync/check/repair/recovery has actually completed to that point. It may be
updated well *after* the sync has happened, but should never be updated
*before*.
However it is entirely possible that the code is not 100% correct.
If you give me details of what you are seeing together with precise kernel
version number I can try to explain them for you.
>
> Setting ranges that are too small (minimum is 1024) makes the check
> *very* slow. I notice that ranges of 1m or even 4m are required to
> get the check to move along close to the maximum speed.
>
> Q: Does the check take time to speed up rather than immediately go at
> the nominated sync_speed_max rate?
This is almost certainly an artifact of the way disk drives work.
To get streaming reads from a disk drive you need to request at least a whole
cylinder at a time. As cylinders differ in size, it really only works if you
request multiple cylinders at a time.
I don't know how big cylinders are these days but I suspect they are a few
hundred K to a Meg. So needing 4M at a time to get streaming happening
doesn't surprise me at all.
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-13 4:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-13 0:01 Q re sync_completed Eyal Lebedinsky
2011-02-13 4:32 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-02-13 7:09 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110213153201.7ceaea0d@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=eyal@eyal.emu.id.au \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).