* [PATCH] FIX: Seg Fault in incremental if BBM log detected
@ 2011-02-16 12:42 Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-02-17 6:07 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Wojcik @ 2011-02-16 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: neilb
Cc: linux-raid, wojciech.neubauer, adam.kwolek, dan.j.williams,
ed.ciechanowski
Bug detected for imsm metadata.
Assembling of array using Incremental switch generate segmentation
fault if BBM log is detected.
Reason: missing return from Incremental_container if BBM is detected
and unnecessary list=NULL assignment.
This patch fix the problem and memory leak in this area.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
---
Incremental.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Incremental.c b/Incremental.c
index 889184f..26739fe 100644
--- a/Incremental.c
+++ b/Incremental.c
@@ -1471,7 +1471,19 @@ static int Incremental_container(struct supertype *st, char *devname,
if (list->array.state & (1<<MD_SB_BBM_ERRORS)) {
fprintf(stderr, Name ": BBM log found in metadata. "
"Cannot activate array(s).\n");
- list = NULL;
+ /* free container data and exit */
+ while (list) {
+ struct mdinfo *d1 = list->next;
+ struct mdinfo *disk = list->devs;
+ while (disk) {
+ struct mdinfo *d2 = disk->next;
+ free(disk);
+ disk = d2;
+ }
+ free(list);
+ list = d1;
+ }
+ return 2;
}
for (ra = list ; ra ; ra = ra->next) {
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] FIX: Seg Fault in incremental if BBM log detected
2011-02-16 12:42 [PATCH] FIX: Seg Fault in incremental if BBM log detected Krzysztof Wojcik
@ 2011-02-17 6:07 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2011-02-17 6:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Wojcik
Cc: linux-raid, wojciech.neubauer, adam.kwolek, dan.j.williams,
ed.ciechanowski
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:42:04 +0100 Krzysztof Wojcik
<krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com> wrote:
> Bug detected for imsm metadata.
> Assembling of array using Incremental switch generate segmentation
> fault if BBM log is detected.
> Reason: missing return from Incremental_container if BBM is detected
> and unnecessary list=NULL assignment.
> This patch fix the problem and memory leak in this area.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
> ---
> Incremental.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Incremental.c b/Incremental.c
> index 889184f..26739fe 100644
> --- a/Incremental.c
> +++ b/Incremental.c
> @@ -1471,7 +1471,19 @@ static int Incremental_container(struct supertype *st, char *devname,
> if (list->array.state & (1<<MD_SB_BBM_ERRORS)) {
> fprintf(stderr, Name ": BBM log found in metadata. "
> "Cannot activate array(s).\n");
> - list = NULL;
> + /* free container data and exit */
> + while (list) {
> + struct mdinfo *d1 = list->next;
> + struct mdinfo *disk = list->devs;
> + while (disk) {
> + struct mdinfo *d2 = disk->next;
> + free(disk);
> + disk = d2;
> + }
> + free(list);
> + list = d1;
> + }
That can all be replaced with
sysfs_free(list);
> + return 2;
With that change, I have applied this patch, thanks.
NeilBrown
> }
>
> for (ra = list ; ra ; ra = ra->next) {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-17 6:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-16 12:42 [PATCH] FIX: Seg Fault in incremental if BBM log detected Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-02-17 6:07 ` NeilBrown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).