From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Mamedov Subject: Re: Network-based RAID6 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:50:52 +0600 Message-ID: <20110330235052.3a803d35@natsu> References: <20110330131157.49fd2521@natsu> <20110330144944.3c87185c@natsu> <4D933188.30003@hardwarefreak.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/u_8rKrBYH/eVe9icAv7xRTT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4D933188.30003@hardwarefreak.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stan Hoeppner Cc: CoolCold , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/u_8rKrBYH/eVe9icAv7xRTT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:35:04 -0500 Stan Hoeppner wrote: > If you want true block level replication over a network, look into DRBD. > However, it is also limited to mirroring. So I guess a viable and interesting solution could be an mdadm stripe over = two or more DRBD mirrors, effectively providing RAID10. Although that's not qui= te what I am looking for (RAID5/6-levels of overhead and resilience). --=20 With respect, Roman --Sig_/u_8rKrBYH/eVe9icAv7xRTT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2TbXwACgkQTLKSvz+PZwiWKgCfQ8XY6zNgpWQ8xVuyGaLEOjLE Mj8An2YBBxBgBa6L8ld5u9FZ85OGzXug =cVwj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/u_8rKrBYH/eVe9icAv7xRTT--