From: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Cc: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:54:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110412165455.GB23764@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DA482B1.5000005@fusionio.com>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 06:49:53PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I realize that, in fact it's already safe as long as you pass in 'true'
> for __blk_run_queue(). Before I had rewritten it to move the running
> out, so that makes the trick a little difficult. This afternoon I also
> tested it and saw no noticable difference, but I'll probably just do it
> anyway as it makes sense.
We still need the lock for __elv_add_request, so we'll need to keep the
logic anyway. But splitting out the just queue to kblockd case from
__blk_run_queue and giving the latter a sane prototype still sounds
like a good idea to me.
Btw, now that we don't call the request_fn directly any more and thus
can't block, can the unplugging be moved into the preempt notifiers?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1295659049-2688-1-git-send-email-jaxboe@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <1295659049-2688-6-git-send-email-jaxboe@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <AANLkTin8FoXX6oqUyW+scwhadyX-TfW16_oKjvngU9-m@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20110303221353.GA10366@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4D761E0D.8050200@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <20110308202100.GA31744@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4D76912C.9040705@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <20110308220526.GA393@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20110310005810.GA17911@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20110405130541.6c2b5f86@notabene.brown>
2011-04-11 4:50 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging NeilBrown
2011-04-11 9:19 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 10:59 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 11:04 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 11:26 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 11:37 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 12:05 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:11 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 12:36 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:48 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 1:12 ` hch
2011-04-12 8:36 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 12:22 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 12:28 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 12:41 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 12:58 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 13:31 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 13:45 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 14:34 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 21:08 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-13 2:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-13 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 11:23 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-13 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 15:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-13 17:35 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:58 ` hch
2011-04-12 17:29 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:44 ` hch
2011-04-12 16:49 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:54 ` hch [this message]
2011-04-12 17:24 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 13:40 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 13:48 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 23:35 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 16:50 ` hch
2011-04-15 4:26 ` hch
2011-04-15 6:34 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-17 22:19 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 4:19 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 6:38 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 7:25 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 8:10 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 8:33 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 8:42 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 21:23 ` hch
2011-04-18 21:30 ` hch
2011-04-18 22:38 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-20 10:55 ` hch
2011-04-18 9:19 ` hch
2011-04-18 9:40 ` [dm-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-04-18 9:47 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 9:46 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 11:55 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:12 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 22:58 ` hch
2011-04-12 6:20 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 16:59 ` hch
2011-04-11 21:14 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 22:59 ` hch
2011-04-12 6:18 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110412165455.GB23764@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).