From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Mamedov Subject: Re: Recommended pci-e 1x SATA cards. Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:25:28 +0600 Message-ID: <20110414172528.72122371@natsu> References: <4DA6CCFE.8020708@crc.id.au> <20110414165433.7a7d1cdc@natsu> <20110414110558.GD6876@baribal.tarvainen.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/ZLgo.OFtjkQ/hAm6FpcPNtP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110414110558.GD6876@baribal.tarvainen.info> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tapani Tarvainen Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/ZLgo.OFtjkQ/hAm6FpcPNtP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:05:59 +0300 Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 04:54:33PM +0600, Roman Mamedov (rm@romanrm.ru) > wrote: >=20 > > I suggest that you avoid Silicon Image 3132, they have data corruption > > issue (on some board designs?), triggered or amplified by transferring = via > > both ports at the same time, at full speed. >=20 > I'd appreciate more details or references on that. See this thread: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.raid/30629 --=20 With respect, Roman --Sig_/ZLgo.OFtjkQ/hAm6FpcPNtP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2m2agACgkQTLKSvz+PZwhvZwCfQpnC0ZoFMDQwwXU0PFW3WgND GBoAoJaomiQfD4jJ+ELT+DaqE9djTJDj =IqD8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ZLgo.OFtjkQ/hAm6FpcPNtP--