From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
ed.ciechanowski@intel.com, wojciech.neubauer@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] FIX: In Grow_restart() array parameters are wrongly used
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:45:30 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110414174530.4f3bba5a@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110411133908.4917.6842.stgit@gklab-128-013.igk.intel.com>
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:39:08 +0200 Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com> wrote:
> Problem can be obvious visible when to 3-disks raid5 array 2 disks are added.
> (added disks number + parity == old disks number)
> Mdadm generates floating point exception and core file is generated
> due to division by 0 (odata == 0).
>
> During restart for external metadata, getinfo_super() returns
> in mdinfo->array.raid_disks old disks number, that has to be increased
> by delta_disks to receive new value. Function getinfo_super()
> cannot return raid_disks field in different way, as array starting
> geometry information. We are still going to final array geometry.
> This Grow_restart() should have in mind and calculate local variables
> in proper way.
>
> This change makes Grow_restart() to interpret parameters in the same way
> as reshape_array() did during reshape start, and it will do it in the same
> way when it will be called from Continue_reshape().
sorry, but I don't like this change.
I never like having different handling for 'external' and 'non-external'.
Sometimes it is obviously necessary, but we should avoid it if possible.
Once reshape has started, 'raid_disks' is the new number of disks, not the
old number.
So sysfs_set_array should be changed to set raid_disks to
raid_disk - delta_disks
in the first instance, then if reshape is active, to raid_disks.
And getinfo_super should return the 'new' number of disks.
And reshape_array might need to fiddle with raid_disks before calling
analyse_change in the reshape_active case.
So it is more changes, but I think it is a better result.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
> ---
>
> Grow.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Grow.c b/Grow.c
> index d4308bc..1fdee7e 100644
> --- a/Grow.c
> +++ b/Grow.c
> @@ -3102,13 +3102,17 @@ int Grow_restart(struct supertype *st, struct mdinfo *info, int *fdlist, int cnt
> unsigned long long nstripe, ostripe;
> int ndata, odata;
>
> - odata = info->array.raid_disks - info->delta_disks - 1;
> + if (st->ss->external) {
> + old_disks = info->array.raid_disks;
> + ndata = info->array.raid_disks + info->delta_disks - 1;
> + } else {
> + old_disks = info->array.raid_disks - info->delta_disks;
> + ndata = info->array.raid_disks - 1;
> + }
> + odata = old_disks - 1;
> if (info->array.level == 6) odata--; /* number of data disks */
> - ndata = info->array.raid_disks - 1;
> if (info->new_level == 6) ndata--;
>
> - old_disks = info->array.raid_disks - info->delta_disks;
> -
> if (info->delta_disks <= 0)
> /* Didn't grow, so the backup file must have
> * been used
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-14 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-11 13:39 [PATCH 1/2] FIX: In Grow_restart() array parameters are wrongly used Adam Kwolek
2011-04-11 13:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] FIX: Set reshape parameters for all disks belongs to new array geometry Adam Kwolek
2011-04-14 7:45 ` NeilBrown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110414174530.4f3bba5a@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=adam.kwolek@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wojciech.neubauer@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).