From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "hch@infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:23:06 -0400 Message-ID: <20110418212306.GA21154@infradead.org> References: <4DA2E03A.2080607@fusionio.com> <20110411212635.7959de70@notabene.brown> <4DA2E7F0.9010904@fusionio.com> <20110411220505.1028816e@notabene.brown> <4DA2F00E.6010907@fusionio.com> <20110418081922.1651474a@notabene.brown> <4DABDC60.2090009@fusionio.com> <20110418172551.55629fc6@notabene.brown> <4DABF1EA.3070301@fusionio.com> <20110418183343.036f412e@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110418183343.036f412e@notabene.brown> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: NeilBrown Cc: Jens Axboe , Mike Snitzer , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "hch@infradead.org" , "dm-devel@redhat.com" , "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-raid.ids > NeilBrown (6): > md: use new plugging interface for RAID IO. > md/dm - remove remains of plug_fn callback. > md - remove old plugging code. > md: provide generic support for handling unplug callbacks. > md: incorporate new plugging into raid5. > md: fix up raid1/raid10 unplugging. Looking over more of the unplugging left over, is there a reason to keep the unplug_work bits in CFQ? They seem to rather counter the current scheme (and it is the last user of kblockd outside of blk-core.c)