From: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:30:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110418213048.GA21852@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110418183343.036f412e@notabene.brown>
> md: provide generic support for handling unplug callbacks.
This looks like some horribly ugly code to me. The real fix is to do
the plugging in the block layers for bios instead of requests. The
effect should be about the same, except that merging will become a
little easier as all bios will be on the list now when calling into
__make_request or it's equivalent, and even better if we extent the
list sort callback to also sort by the start block it will actually
simplify the merge algorithm a lot as it only needs to do front merges
and no back merges for the on-stack merging.
In addition it should also allow for much more optimal queue_lock
roundtrips - we can keep it locked at the end of what's currently
__make_request to have it available for the next bio that's been
on the list. If it either can be merged now that we have the lock
and/or we optimize get_request_wait not to sleep in the fast path
we could get down to a single queue_lock roundtrip for each unplug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-18 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1295659049-2688-1-git-send-email-jaxboe@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <1295659049-2688-6-git-send-email-jaxboe@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <AANLkTin8FoXX6oqUyW+scwhadyX-TfW16_oKjvngU9-m@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20110303221353.GA10366@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4D761E0D.8050200@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <20110308202100.GA31744@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4D76912C.9040705@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <20110308220526.GA393@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20110310005810.GA17911@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20110405130541.6c2b5f86@notabene.brown>
2011-04-11 4:50 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging NeilBrown
2011-04-11 9:19 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 10:59 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 11:04 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 11:26 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 11:37 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 12:05 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:11 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 12:36 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:48 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 1:12 ` hch
2011-04-12 8:36 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 12:22 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 12:28 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 12:41 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 12:58 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 13:31 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 13:45 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 14:34 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 21:08 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-13 2:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-13 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 11:23 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-13 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 15:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-13 17:35 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:58 ` hch
2011-04-12 17:29 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:44 ` hch
2011-04-12 16:49 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:54 ` hch
2011-04-12 17:24 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 13:40 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 13:48 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 23:35 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 16:50 ` hch
2011-04-15 4:26 ` hch
2011-04-15 6:34 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-17 22:19 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 4:19 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 6:38 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 7:25 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 8:10 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 8:33 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 8:42 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 21:23 ` hch
2011-04-18 21:30 ` hch [this message]
2011-04-18 22:38 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-20 10:55 ` hch
2011-04-18 9:19 ` hch
2011-04-18 9:40 ` [dm-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-04-18 9:47 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 9:46 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 11:55 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:12 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 22:58 ` hch
2011-04-12 6:20 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 16:59 ` hch
2011-04-11 21:14 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 22:59 ` hch
2011-04-12 6:18 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110418213048.GA21852@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).