linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@keldix.com>
To: Roberto Spadim <roberto@spadim.com.br>
Cc: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@keldix.com>,
	"Miles Fidelman" <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wish for Linux MD mirrored raid types
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:29:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110506182939.GA23860@www2.open-std.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik8A0szuNk2HvDqQXpY3tSAdPoUKA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:34:36PM -0300, Roberto Spadim wrote:
> hum, i asked this question one time, the point is:
> raid1 code is very easy
> raid10 code is more complex
> 
> easy = faster, less memory, less cpu
> complex = faster?, more memory? more cpu?


I think more complex -> more intelligent, more features.

I think it is actually amazing what raid10 can do.
Is raid 1 in other systems really limited to say 2 disks
- mirrored? Then linux raid10 is much more intelligent. 
> 
> check others raid system (freebsd, netbsd) and check how they do...

Yes, and also HW raid. If Linux made raid10,far the default for RAID1,
then I think Linux would compare very well with other operating systems
and HW raid.

Best regards
keld

----

> 2011/5/6 Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@keldix.com>:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 10:01:48AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> >> Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> >> >>As you say, RAID10,near on four disks is pretty much identical to
> >> >>RAID1+0 - i.e., a stripe of two normal RAID1 pairs.
> >> >>
> >>
> >> I don't that's exactly right.  At least as I understand it:
> >>
> >> - RAID1+0 (and RAID0+1) nests things - you start with two sets of RAID1
> >> mirrors, then stripe across them (or vice versa) - it's a nested set of
> >> steps
> >>
> >> - md RAID10 provides both mirroring and striping, but it's a more
> >> integrated function - (from the man page) "RAID10 provides a combination
> >> of RAID1 and RAID0, and sometimes known as RAID1+0. Every datablock is
> >> duplicated some number of times, and the resulting collection of
> >> datablocks are distributed over multiple drives." - but there isn't an
> >> inherent nesting in the process (i.e., no two disks are copies of each
> >> other, and md RAID10 will work over odd numbers of drives)
> >
> > Yes, you are right, RAID1+0 is nested, while Linux MD raid10 is not.
> > But the data layout of Linux MD RAID1+0 and Linux MD
> > RAID10,near is almost identical.
> >
> > keld
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Roberto Spadim
> Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-06 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-06  7:17 wish for Linux MD mirrored raid types Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-06  7:31 ` Roman Mamedov
2011-05-06  9:03   ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-06  9:22     ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-05-06  9:41       ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-06  9:50         ` Roman Mamedov
2011-05-06 10:05           ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-05-06 10:54             ` David Brown
2011-05-06 13:27               ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-06 14:01                 ` Miles Fidelman
2011-05-06 15:24                   ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-06 15:34                     ` Roberto Spadim
2011-05-06 16:23                       ` Miles Fidelman
2011-05-06 18:29                       ` Keld Jørn Simonsen [this message]
2011-05-06 20:30                 ` Leslie Rhorer
2011-05-06 20:43                   ` Miles Fidelman
2011-05-06 12:33           ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-06 13:26             ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2011-05-06 13:40               ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-06  7:51 ` David Brown
2011-05-06  9:27   ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-08 18:14 ` Luca Berra
2011-05-08 21:25   ` Miles Fidelman
2011-05-09  3:40     ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-09  4:24       ` NeilBrown
2011-05-09 19:57         ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-09  5:22 ` Emmanuel Noobadmin
2011-05-09 14:48   ` Roberto Spadim
2011-05-09 19:59   ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-09 20:12     ` Roberto Spadim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110506182939.GA23860@www2.open-std.org \
    --to=keld@keldix.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfidelman@meetinghouse.net \
    --cc=roberto@spadim.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).