linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Pol Hallen <raid1@fuckaround.org>
Cc: Linux-RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Performarce raid6 degraded
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 22:37:23 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110521223723.7d2f5f1a@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201105211316.18565.raid1@fuckaround.org>

On Sat, 21 May 2011 13:16:18 +0200 Pol Hallen <raid1@fuckaround.org> wrote:

> Hi folks, after fail of a disk on my raid6 sw I check with dd the performance 
> of raid:
> 
> dd if=/dev/zero of=degradedraid bs=1000024 count=100
> 100+0 records in
> 100+0 records out
> 100002400 bytes (100 MB) copied, 288.254 s, 347 kB/s
> 
> is it correct? only 347Kb/s on a raid6 degraded?

What was it when the array was not degraded?

1000024 is a rather  strange block size to use.  Try a power of 2 and see if
it makes a difference.

I would expect large sequential writes to go at much the same speed as
non-degraded, but smaller or non-aligned writes could certainly go more
slowly - maybe half speed at a guess.

NeilBrown


> 
> mdadm --detail /dev/md0
> /dev/md0:
>         Version : 0.90
>   Creation Time : Mon Sep 27 14:19:15 2010
>      Raid Level : raid6
>      Array Size : 5860543744 (5589.05 GiB 6001.20 GB)
>   Used Dev Size : 1465135936 (1397.26 GiB 1500.30 GB)
>    Raid Devices : 6
>   Total Devices : 7
> Preferred Minor : 0
>     Persistence : Superblock is persistent
> 
>     Update Time : Sat May 21 13:14:43 2011
>           State : active, degraded
>  Active Devices : 5
> Working Devices : 5
>  Failed Devices : 2
>   Spare Devices : 0
> 
>          Layout : left-symmetric
>      Chunk Size : 64K
> 
>            UUID : 9bd6372e:e2eab1d5:d2bdc3cb:ad12f41d
>          Events : 0.385693
> 
>     Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
>        0       8        1        0      active sync   /dev/sda1
>        1       8       17        1      active sync   /dev/sdb1
>        2       0        0        2      removed
>        3       8       81        3      active sync   /dev/sdf1
>        4       8       65        4      active sync   /dev/sde1
>        5       8       49        5      active sync   /dev/sdd1
> 
>        6       8      145        -      faulty spare
>        7       8       33        -      faulty spare
> 
> thanks!
>  
> Pol
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-21 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-21 11:16 Performarce raid6 degraded Pol Hallen
2011-05-21 12:37 ` NeilBrown [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-22 12:57 Pol Hallen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110521223723.7d2f5f1a@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raid1@fuckaround.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).