From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, wojciech.neubauer@intel.com,
adam.kwolek@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
ed.ciechanowski@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/22] FIX: Initialize reshape structure
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:54:09 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110608165409.0aecac44@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110602144900.27355.65493.stgit@gklab-128-111.igk.intel.com>
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:49:00 +0200 Krzysztof Wojcik
<krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com> wrote:
> From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
>
> It can occurs that reshape structure can contain random values.
> Due to this fact analyse_change() can disallow for grow start
> without real cause (e.g. check of uninitialized new_chunk).
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
> ---
> Grow.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Grow.c b/Grow.c
> index 7a8ffdb..11b2214 100644
> --- a/Grow.c
> +++ b/Grow.c
> @@ -1745,6 +1745,7 @@ static int reshape_array(char *container, int fd, char *devname,
> info->component_size = array_size / array.raid_disks;
> }
>
> + memset(&reshape, 0, sizeof(reshape));
> if (info->reshape_active) {
> int new_level = info->new_level;
> info->new_level = UnSet;
This doesn't make any sense to me.
I cannot see how any random numbers in 'reshape' can cause analyse_change to
do the wrong thing, and there is no "new_chunk" in 'reshape' that could be
"uninitialized"..
Please explain.
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-08 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-02 14:48 [PATCH 00/22] IMSM checkpointing implementation Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:48 ` [PATCH 01/22] imsm: Add migration record to intel_super Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:48 ` [PATCH 02/22] Support restore_stripes() from the given buffer Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:48 ` [PATCH 03/22] Define dummy functions to mdmon.c Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:48 ` [PATCH 04/22] imsm: Add support for copy area and backup operations Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:48 ` [PATCH 05/22] imsm: check migration compatibility Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:49 ` [PATCH 06/22] FIX: Initialize reshape structure Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-08 6:54 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-06-02 14:49 ` [PATCH 07/22] imsm: Add wait_for_reshape_imsm() implementation Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-08 7:07 ` NeilBrown
2011-06-02 14:49 ` [PATCH 08/22] imsm: Implement imsm_manage_reshape(), reshape workhorse Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:49 ` [PATCH 09/22] imsm: Check if array degradation has been changed Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:49 ` [PATCH 10/22] imsm: Clear migration record when no migration in progress Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:49 ` [PATCH 11/22] imsm: Add information about migration record to mdadm '-E' option Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:49 ` [PATCH 12/22] imsm: update blocks_per_migr_unit() to support migration record Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:49 ` [PATCH 13/22] Add reshape restart support for external metadata Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 14/22] imsm: Implement recover_backup_imsm() for imsm metadata Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 15/22] imsm: Disable checkpoint updating by mdmon for general migration Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 16/22] imsm: Add metadata update type for general migration check-pointing Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 17/22] imsm: Prepare checkpoint update for general migration Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 18/22] imsm: Apply checkpoint metadata " Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 19/22] FIX: Enable metadata updates for raid0 Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 20/22] Do not use backup file for external metadata Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:51 ` [PATCH 21/22] imsm: Remove user warning before reshape start Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-02 14:51 ` [PATCH 22/22] imsm: Unit Tests - remove backup-file during grow command Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-08 7:23 ` [PATCH 00/22] IMSM checkpointing implementation NeilBrown
2011-06-08 7:34 ` Wojcik, Krzysztof
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110608165409.0aecac44@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=adam.kwolek@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
--cc=krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wojciech.neubauer@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).