* Unstable speed or correct?
@ 2011-06-09 7:09 Pol Hallen
[not found] ` <BANLkTimbhe+qmTyVWKbRt6TZ9cynmmVNRw@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pol Hallen @ 2011-06-09 7:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Hi folks :-)
I've a raid6 sw (6disks from 1.5Tb) asus p5b-e.
Yestarday I done some checks tests and I see this:
http://fuckaround.org/nuvola/
is it correct (read) speed or is there a problem?
The read line oscillate and I don't understand if there a problem.
hdparm, smartctl and other diagnostic tool doesn't report any problem..
raid6 is correctly runs.
Any idea?
thanks!
Pol
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread[parent not found: <BANLkTimbhe+qmTyVWKbRt6TZ9cynmmVNRw@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: Unstable speed or correct? [not found] ` <BANLkTimbhe+qmTyVWKbRt6TZ9cynmmVNRw@mail.gmail.com> @ 2011-06-09 9:02 ` Pol Hallen [not found] ` <BANLkTimQ854noJpPEstnaG2CvsWvXFiWoQ@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Pol Hallen @ 2011-06-09 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Durval Menezes; +Cc: linux-raid > What benchmark program did you use for the test? Also, was there any other > programs running at the same time? Was the machine in single-user (init 1) > state? hello :-) dd if=/dev/zero of=/share/raid6/1Gb bs=1024 count=1000000 1000000+0 records in 1000000+0 records out 1024000000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 12.1632 s, 84.2 MB/s dd if=/dev/zero of=/share/raid6/10Gb bs=1024 count=10000000 10000000+0 records in 10000000+0 records out 10240000000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 142.021 s, 72.1 MB/s That graphic with palimptest (gnome-disk-utility). No other applications uses raid (I'm on init 2 but samba, ftp, and other daemons are off) iostat not show me any activity by raid, so I think there is not programs that runs on array. thanks :-) Pol ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <BANLkTimQ854noJpPEstnaG2CvsWvXFiWoQ@mail.gmail.com>]
* Unstable speed or correct? [not found] ` <BANLkTimQ854noJpPEstnaG2CvsWvXFiWoQ@mail.gmail.com> @ 2011-06-09 9:36 ` Durval Menezes 2011-06-09 11:25 ` Pol Hallen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Durval Menezes @ 2011-06-09 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pol Hallen, linux-raid Hello Pol. On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Pol Hallen <raid2@fuckaround.org> wrote: > > > What benchmark program did you use for the test? Also, was there any other > > programs running at the same time? Was the machine in single-user (init 1) > > state? > > hello :-) > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/share/raid6/1Gb bs=1024 count=1000000 > 1000000+0 records in > 1000000+0 records out > 1024000000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 12.1632 s, 84.2 MB/s > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/share/raid6/10Gb bs=1024 count=10000000 > 10000000+0 records in > 10000000+0 records out > 10240000000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 142.021 s, 72.1 MB/s The above dd's seem much more consistent than the graph. > That graphic with palimptest (gnome-disk-utility). I'm not familiar with this program (BTW, you mean "palimpsest", right?), and I've run it for the first time on my system (M4A785-M with Phenon-II X6 1055T, 4GB RAM, with 3 x ST31500541AS 1.5TB 3.5" 5900RPM HDs plugged directly onto the motherboard's SB700 SATA controller, running Ubuntu Lucid Lynx 10.04.1 LTS, kernel 2.6.32-32-generic; the 3 HDs are mounted as a RAID5 md device and dedicated to user data-only storage and mounted as /usr2, the root filesystem runs on a separate SSD disk). Here's my palimpsest graph: http://durval.com/felwithe_raid5_palimpsest_ro_20110609.jpg Note that it shows much less "jitter" (local variation) than your graph. > No other applications uses raid (I'm on init 2 but samba, ftp, and other > daemons are off) > > iostat not show me any activity by raid, so I think there is not programs that > runs on array. This is very strange... concurrent access by other programs would certainly explain the variation on your graph. I would try running some other benchmark that can be run on single-user state to see if the variation remains. If it does, then I would conclude that there's something wrong (possibly on your hardware, like a failing disk doing retries/reseeks). Cheers, -- Durval Menezes. > > thanks :-) > > Pol -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Unstable speed or correct? 2011-06-09 9:36 ` Durval Menezes @ 2011-06-09 11:25 ` Pol Hallen 2011-06-09 11:52 ` Pol Hallen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Pol Hallen @ 2011-06-09 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Durval Menezes; +Cc: linux-raid > I'm not familiar with this program (BTW, you mean "palimpsest", > right?) yep :-) > I would try running some other benchmark iozone3 and bonnie? Do u known other bench programs? > that can be run on > single-user next day I'll try do these benchs to init 1 >if it does, then I > would conclude that there's something wrong (possibly on your > hardware, like a failing disk doing retries/reseeks). I already examined all disks by smartclt, hdparm and seem there aren't problems :-/ Is ram a possible problem? How hardware test I'll do? thanks :-) Pol ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Unstable speed or correct? 2011-06-09 11:25 ` Pol Hallen @ 2011-06-09 11:52 ` Pol Hallen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Pol Hallen @ 2011-06-09 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-raid init 1 raid 6 performance: http://fuckaround.org/nuvola/?p=17 iostat md0 -x 1: Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util md0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 :-((( Pol ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-09 11:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-09 7:09 Unstable speed or correct? Pol Hallen
[not found] ` <BANLkTimbhe+qmTyVWKbRt6TZ9cynmmVNRw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-06-09 9:02 ` Pol Hallen
[not found] ` <BANLkTimQ854noJpPEstnaG2CvsWvXFiWoQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-06-09 9:36 ` Durval Menezes
2011-06-09 11:25 ` Pol Hallen
2011-06-09 11:52 ` Pol Hallen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).