From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Piergiorgio Sartor Subject: Re: Triple-parity raid6 Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:13:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20110611101312.GA3528@lazy.lzy> References: <20110609114954.243e9e22@notabene.brown> <20110609220438.26336b27@notabene.brown> <87aadq5q1l.fsf@gmail.com> <4DF20C18.3030604@christoph-d.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Brown Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids [snip] > Of course, all this assume that my maths is correct ! I would suggest to check out the Reed-Solomon thing in the more friendly form of Vandermonde matrix. It will be completely clear how to generate k parity set with n data set (disk), so that n+k < 258 for the GF(256) space. It will also be much more clear how to re-construct the data set in case of erasure (known data lost). You can have a look, for reference, at: http://lsirwww.epfl.ch/wdas2004/Presentations/manasse.ppt If you search for something like "Reed Solomon Vandermonde" you'll find even more information. Hope this helps. bye, -- piergiorgio