From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mdadm: Linux 3.x version change
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:54:04 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110617225404.62fe6f42@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DFB4627.7050809@redhat.com>
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:18:47 +0200 Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/10/2011 04:30 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > As Linux 3.x changes its versioning scheme, we have to deal with
> > the 2-digit version number also.
> FYI: we have patch below currently in Fedora rawhide
> (which already switched to 3.0-rc numbering scheme).
>
> Without it is system unable to assembly RAID during boot
> ("mdadm -As --auto=yes --run" fails because of wrong version detected).
>
> It seems that 3.2.2 still have the same problem.
>
> Milan
>
> --- mdadm-3.2.1.old/util.c 2011-03-28 04:31:20.000000000 +0200
> +++ mdadm-3.2.1/util.c 2011-06-05 07:59:03.741904751 +0200
> @@ -154,8 +154,8 @@ int get_linux_version()
> a = strtoul(cp, &cp, 10);
> if (*cp != '.') return -1;
> b = strtoul(cp+1, &cp, 10);
> - if (*cp != '.') return -1;
> - c = strtoul(cp+1, NULL, 10);
> + if (*cp != '.' && a <= 2) return -1;
> + c = (*cp == '.') ? strtoul(cp+1, NULL, 10) : 0;
>
> return (a*1000000)+(b*1000)+c;
> }
>
Bother - I always seem to miss something :-(
I have added the following (which is different yet again) to git.
According to https://lwn.net/Articles/447572/ it seems it isn't yet 100%
certain that the next version will be 3.0 rather than 3.0.0.... So I might
not need to push out a new version too quickly.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
From f161d047eed634b3380262767f955eb888502e88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:49:24 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] util: correctly parse shorter linux version numbers.
The next version of Linux might be 3.0. If it is, get_linux_version
will fail.
So make it more robust.
Reported-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
util.c | 10 +++++-----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/util.c b/util.c
index 10bbe56..55d171a 100644
--- a/util.c
+++ b/util.c
@@ -146,16 +146,16 @@ int get_linux_version()
{
struct utsname name;
char *cp;
- int a,b,c;
+ int a = 0, b = 0,c = 0;
if (uname(&name) <0)
return -1;
cp = name.release;
a = strtoul(cp, &cp, 10);
- if (*cp != '.') return -1;
- b = strtoul(cp+1, &cp, 10);
- if (*cp != '.') return -1;
- c = strtoul(cp+1, NULL, 10);
+ if (*cp == '.')
+ b = strtoul(cp+1, &cp, 10);
+ if (*cp == '.')
+ c = strtoul(cp+1, &cp, 10);
return (a*1000000)+(b*1000)+c;
}
--
1.7.3.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-17 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-10 14:30 [PATCH] mdadm: Linux 3.x version change Namhyung Kim
2011-06-17 12:18 ` Milan Broz
2011-06-17 12:54 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-06-17 14:07 ` David Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110617225404.62fe6f42@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbroz@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).