From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Subject: Re: Which Disks can fail? Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:45:09 +1000 Message-ID: <20110621204509.6309c38f@notabene.brown> References: <4E007154.9030107@abpni.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4E007154.9030107@abpni.co.uk> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jonathan Tripathy Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:24:20 +0100 Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Use md's "single process" RAID10 with the standard near layout (which is > apperently the same as RAID1+0 in industry), which 2 drives could fail > without loosing the array? > > This is what I have: > > Number Major Minor RaidDevice State > 0 8 5 0 active sync /dev/sda5 > 1 8 21 1 active sync /dev/sdb5 > 2 8 37 2 active sync /dev/sdc5 > 3 8 53 3 active sync /dev/sdd5 > > Thanks > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Run man 4 md search for "RAID10" read what you find, and if it doesn't make sense, ask again. If it does make sense, post your answer and feel free to ask for confirmation. NeilBrown