From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, wojciech.neubauer@intel.com,
adam.kwolek@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
ed.ciechanowski@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Show DELAYED, PENDING status of resync process in "--detail"
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:07:45 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110623120745.19756ad7@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110618141035.14426.58645.stgit@gklab-128-111.igk.intel.com>
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:10:35 +0200 Krzysztof Wojcik
<krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com> wrote:
> Initialy there is no proper translation mdstat's DEYALED/PENDING processes
> to "--detail" output.
> For example, if we have revover=DELAYED in mdstat, "--detail"
> shows "State: recovering" and "Rebuild Status = 0%".
> It was incorrect in case of process waiting on checkpoint different
> than 0%. In fact rebuild status is differnt than 0% and user is misled.
>
> The patch fix the problem. Current "--detail" command shows
> in the exampe: "State: recovering (DELAYED)" and no information
> about precentage.
Looks good.
Applied, thanks.
NeilBrown
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
> ---
> Detail.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> mdadm.h | 2 ++
> mdstat.c | 8 ++++----
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Detail.c b/Detail.c
> index 375189d..e9f71d8 100644
> --- a/Detail.c
> +++ b/Detail.c
> @@ -372,11 +372,13 @@ int Detail(char *dev, int brief, int export, int test, char *homehost)
> else
> st = ", degraded";
>
> - printf(" State : %s%s%s%s\n",
> - (array.state&(1<<MD_SB_CLEAN))?"clean":"active",
> - st,
> - (!e || e->percent < 0) ? "" : sync_action[e->resync],
> - larray_size ? "": ", Not Started");
> + printf(" State : %s%s%s%s%s%s \n",
> + (array.state&(1<<MD_SB_CLEAN))?"clean":"active", st,
> + (!e || (e->percent < 0 && e->percent != PROCESS_PENDING &&
> + e->percent != PROCESS_DELAYED)) ? "" : sync_action[e->resync],
> + larray_size ? "": ", Not Started",
> + e->percent == PROCESS_DELAYED ? " (DELAYED)": "",
> + e->percent == PROCESS_PENDING ? " (PENDING)": "");
> }
> if (array.raid_disks)
> printf(" Active Devices : %d\n", array.active_disks);
> @@ -416,10 +418,8 @@ int Detail(char *dev, int brief, int export, int test, char *homehost)
> }
>
> if (e && e->percent >= 0) {
> - printf(" Re%s Status : %d%% complete\n",
> - (st && st->sb && info->reshape_active)?
> - "shape":"build",
> - e->percent);
> + static char *sync_action[] = {"Rebuild", "Resync", "Reshape", "Check"};
> + printf(" %s Status : %d%% complete\n", sync_action[e->resync], e->percent);
> is_rebuilding = 1;
> }
> free_mdstat(ms);
> diff --git a/mdadm.h b/mdadm.h
> index e075dd2..8bd0077 100644
> --- a/mdadm.h
> +++ b/mdadm.h
> @@ -1345,3 +1345,5 @@ static inline int xasprintf(char **strp, const char *fmt, ...) {
> #define PATH_MAX 4096
> #endif
>
> +#define PROCESS_DELAYED -2
> +#define PROCESS_PENDING -3
> diff --git a/mdstat.c b/mdstat.c
> index 3d2edad..abf6bf9 100644
> --- a/mdstat.c
> +++ b/mdstat.c
> @@ -257,10 +257,10 @@ struct mdstat_ent *mdstat_read(int hold, int start)
> if (strncmp(w, "check", 5)==0)
> ent->resync = 3;
>
> - if (l > 8 && strcmp(w+l-8, "=DELAYED"))
> - ent->percent = 0;
> - if (l > 8 && strcmp(w+l-8, "=PENDING"))
> - ent->percent = 0;
> + if (l > 8 && strcmp(w+l-8, "=DELAYED") == 0)
> + ent->percent = PROCESS_DELAYED;
> + if (l > 8 && strcmp(w+l-8, "=PENDING") == 0)
> + ent->percent = PROCESS_PENDING;
> } else if (ent->percent == -1 &&
> w[0] >= '0' &&
> w[0] <= '9' &&
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-23 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-18 14:10 [PATCH] Show DELAYED, PENDING status of resync process in "--detail" Krzysztof Wojcik
2011-06-23 2:07 ` NeilBrown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110623120745.19756ad7@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=adam.kwolek@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
--cc=krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wojciech.neubauer@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).