linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [md PATCH 16/34] md/raid5: unite fetch_block5 and fetch_block6
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:32:26 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110721023226.6728.42897.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110721022537.6728.90204.stgit@notabene.brown>

Provided that ->failed_num[1] is not a valid device number (which is
easily achieved) fetch_block6 provides all the functionality of
fetch_block5.

So remove the latter and rename the former to simply "fetch_block".

Then handle_stripe_fill5 and handle_stripe_fill6 become the same and
can similarly be united.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---

 drivers/md/raid5.c |  107 +++++++++++-----------------------------------------
 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 100ac1f..ea796a9 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2308,91 +2308,20 @@ handle_failed_stripe(raid5_conf_t *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
 			md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
 }
 
-/* fetch_block5 - checks the given member device to see if its data needs
+/* fetch_block - checks the given member device to see if its data needs
  * to be read or computed to satisfy a request.
  *
  * Returns 1 when no more member devices need to be checked, otherwise returns
- * 0 to tell the loop in handle_stripe_fill5 to continue
+ * 0 to tell the loop in handle_stripe_fill to continue
  */
-static int fetch_block5(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s,
-			int disk_idx, int disks)
-{
-	struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[disk_idx];
-	struct r5dev *failed_dev = &sh->dev[s->failed_num[0]];
-
-	/* is the data in this block needed, and can we get it? */
-	if (!test_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags) &&
-	    !test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags) &&
-	    (dev->toread ||
-	     (dev->towrite && !test_bit(R5_OVERWRITE, &dev->flags)) ||
-	     s->syncing || s->expanding ||
-	     (s->failed && failed_dev->toread) ||
-	     (s->failed && failed_dev->towrite &&
-		!test_bit(R5_OVERWRITE, &failed_dev->flags)))))) {
-		/* We would like to get this block, possibly by computing it,
-		 * otherwise read it if the backing disk is insync
-		 */
-		if ((s->uptodate == disks - 1) &&
-		    (s->failed && disk_idx == s->failed_num[0])) {
-			set_bit(STRIPE_COMPUTE_RUN, &sh->state);
-			set_bit(STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_BLK, &s->ops_request);
-			set_bit(R5_Wantcompute, &dev->flags);
-			sh->ops.target = disk_idx;
-			sh->ops.target2 = -1;
-			s->req_compute = 1;
-			/* Careful: from this point on 'uptodate' is in the eye
-			 * of raid_run_ops which services 'compute' operations
-			 * before writes. R5_Wantcompute flags a block that will
-			 * be R5_UPTODATE by the time it is needed for a
-			 * subsequent operation.
-			 */
-			s->uptodate++;
-			return 1; /* uptodate + compute == disks */
-		} else if (test_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags)) {
-			set_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags);
-			set_bit(R5_Wantread, &dev->flags);
-			s->locked++;
-			pr_debug("Reading block %d (sync=%d)\n", disk_idx,
-				s->syncing);
-		}
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/**
- * handle_stripe_fill5 - read or compute data to satisfy pending requests.
- */
-static void handle_stripe_fill5(struct stripe_head *sh,
-			struct stripe_head_state *s, int disks)
-{
-	int i;
-
-	/* look for blocks to read/compute, skip this if a compute
-	 * is already in flight, or if the stripe contents are in the
-	 * midst of changing due to a write
-	 */
-	if (!test_bit(STRIPE_COMPUTE_RUN, &sh->state) && !sh->check_state &&
-	    !sh->reconstruct_state)
-		for (i = disks; i--; )
-			if (fetch_block5(sh, s, i, disks))
-				break;
-	set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
-}
-
-/* fetch_block6 - checks the given member device to see if its data needs
- * to be read or computed to satisfy a request.
- *
- * Returns 1 when no more member devices need to be checked, otherwise returns
- * 0 to tell the loop in handle_stripe_fill6 to continue
- */
-static int fetch_block6(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s,
-			int disk_idx, int disks)
+static int fetch_block(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s,
+		       int disk_idx, int disks)
 {
 	struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[disk_idx];
 	struct r5dev *fdev[2] = { &sh->dev[s->failed_num[0]],
 				  &sh->dev[s->failed_num[1]] };
 
+	/* is the data in this block needed, and can we get it? */
 	if (!test_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags) &&
 	    !test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags) &&
 	    (dev->toread ||
@@ -2400,7 +2329,9 @@ static int fetch_block6(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s,
 	     s->syncing || s->expanding ||
 	     (s->failed >= 1 && fdev[0]->toread) ||
 	     (s->failed >= 2 && fdev[1]->toread) ||
-	     (s->failed && s->to_write)) {
+	     (sh->raid_conf->level <= 5 && s->failed && fdev[0]->towrite &&
+	      !test_bit(R5_OVERWRITE, &fdev[0]->flags)) ||
+	     (sh->raid_conf->level == 6 && s->failed && s->to_write))) {
 		/* we would like to get this block, possibly by computing it,
 		 * otherwise read it if the backing disk is insync
 		 */
@@ -2420,6 +2351,12 @@ static int fetch_block6(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s,
 			sh->ops.target = disk_idx;
 			sh->ops.target2 = -1; /* no 2nd target */
 			s->req_compute = 1;
+			/* Careful: from this point on 'uptodate' is in the eye
+			 * of raid_run_ops which services 'compute' operations
+			 * before writes. R5_Wantcompute flags a block that will
+			 * be R5_UPTODATE by the time it is needed for a
+			 * subsequent operation.
+			 */
 			s->uptodate++;
 			return 1;
 		} else if (s->uptodate == disks-2 && s->failed >= 2) {
@@ -2460,11 +2397,11 @@ static int fetch_block6(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s,
 }
 
 /**
- * handle_stripe_fill6 - read or compute data to satisfy pending requests.
+ * handle_stripe_fill - read or compute data to satisfy pending requests.
  */
-static void handle_stripe_fill6(struct stripe_head *sh,
-			struct stripe_head_state *s,
-			int disks)
+static void handle_stripe_fill(struct stripe_head *sh,
+			       struct stripe_head_state *s,
+			       int disks)
 {
 	int i;
 
@@ -2475,7 +2412,7 @@ static void handle_stripe_fill6(struct stripe_head *sh,
 	if (!test_bit(STRIPE_COMPUTE_RUN, &sh->state) && !sh->check_state &&
 	    !sh->reconstruct_state)
 		for (i = disks; i--; )
-			if (fetch_block6(sh, s, i, disks))
+			if (fetch_block(sh, s, i, disks))
 				break;
 	set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
 }
@@ -3123,7 +3060,7 @@ static int handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
 	 */
 	if (s->to_read || s->non_overwrite ||
 	    (s->syncing && (s->uptodate + s->compute < disks)) || s->expanding)
-		handle_stripe_fill5(sh, s, disks);
+		handle_stripe_fill(sh, s, disks);
 
 	/* Now we check to see if any write operations have recently
 	 * completed
@@ -3314,7 +3251,7 @@ static int handle_stripe6(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
 	 */
 	if (s->to_read || s->non_overwrite || (s->to_write && s->failed) ||
 	    (s->syncing && (s->uptodate + s->compute < disks)) || s->expanding)
-		handle_stripe_fill6(sh, s, disks);
+		handle_stripe_fill(sh, s, disks);
 
 	/* Now we check to see if any write operations have recently
 	 * completed
@@ -3398,6 +3335,8 @@ static void handle_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
 	s.syncing = test_bit(STRIPE_SYNCING, &sh->state);
 	s.expanding = test_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_SOURCE, &sh->state);
 	s.expanded = test_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_READY, &sh->state);
+	s.failed_num[0] = -1;
+	s.failed_num[1] = -1;
 
 	if (conf->level == 6)
 		done = handle_stripe6(sh, &s);



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-21  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-21  2:32 [md PATCH 00/34] md patches for 3.1 - part 1 NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 01/34] md/raid10: get rid of duplicated conditional expression NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 02/34] md/raid10: factor out common bio handling code NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 03/34] md/raid10: share pages between read and write bio's during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 05/34] md/raid5: get rid of duplicated call to bio_data_dir() NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 10/34] md/raid5: unify stripe_head_state and r6_state NeilBrown
2011-07-22  4:49   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22  5:15     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22  5:37       ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22  5:53         ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  6:44           ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 09/34] md/raid5: move common code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22  4:30   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 06/34] md/raid5: Remove use of sh->lock in sync_request NeilBrown
2011-07-22  3:39   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 11/34] md/raid5: add some more fields to stripe_head_state NeilBrown
2011-07-22  5:31   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  1:35     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 04/34] md/raid5: use kmem_cache_zalloc() NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 07/34] md/raid5: Protect some more code with ->device_lock NeilBrown
2011-07-22  3:54   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 08/34] md/raid5: replace sh->lock with an 'active' flag NeilBrown
2011-07-22  4:27   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22  4:49     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22  5:03       ` Namhyung Kim
2011-08-03 22:47   ` Dan Williams
2011-08-03 23:35     ` NeilBrown
2011-08-03 23:45       ` Williams, Dan J
2011-08-04  0:18         ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 18/34] md/raid5: move more common code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22  9:20   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 17/34] md/raid5: unite handle_stripe_dirtying5 and handle_stripe_dirtying6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22  9:10   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  1:52     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26  2:41       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-26  9:40       ` David Brown
2011-07-26 13:23         ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 15:01           ` David Brown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 12/34] md/raid5: move stripe_head_state and more code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22  5:41   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 13/34] md/raid5: Move code for finishing a reconstruction " NeilBrown
2011-07-22  7:09   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  1:44     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 19/34] md/raid5: move some more common code " NeilBrown
2011-07-22  9:29   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  1:59     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-07-22  8:24   ` [md PATCH 16/34] md/raid5: unite fetch_block5 and fetch_block6 Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 15/34] md/raid5: rearrange a test in fetch_block6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22  7:37   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 14/34] md/raid5: move more code into common handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22  7:32   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  1:48     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 20/34] md/raid5: finalise new merged handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22  9:36   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  2:02     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26  4:50       ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 25/34] md: change managed of recovery_disabled NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 22/34] md/raid: use printk_ratelimited instead of printk_ratelimit NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 24/34] md: remove ro check in md_check_recovery() NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 23/34] md: introduce link/unlink_rdev() helpers NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 27/34] md/raid10: Improve decision on whether to fail a device with a read error NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 21/34] md: use proper little-endian bitops NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 26/34] md/raid10: Make use of new recovery_disabled handling NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 32/34] md/raid5: Avoid BUG caused by multiple failures NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 33/34] MD: raid1 s/sysfs_notify_dirent/sysfs_notify_dirent_safe NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 34/34] MD bitmap: Revert DM dirty log hooks NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 31/34] md/raid10: move rdev->corrected_errors counting NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 30/34] md/raid5: " NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 29/34] md/raid1: " NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 28/34] md: get rid of unnecessary casts on page_address() NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110721023226.6728.42897.stgit@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).