From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [md PATCH 20/34] md/raid5: finalise new merged handle_stripe.
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:32:27 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110721023226.6728.78219.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110721022537.6728.90204.stgit@notabene.brown>
handle_stripe5() and handle_stripe6() are now virtually identical.
So discard one and rename the other to 'analyse_stripe()'.
It always returns 0, so change it to 'void' and remove the 'done'
variable in handle_stripe().
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 100 +++-------------------------------------------------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index f23848f..93ee26c 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2899,88 +2899,7 @@ static void handle_stripe_expansion(raid5_conf_t *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
*
*/
-static int handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
-{
- raid5_conf_t *conf = sh->raid_conf;
- int disks = sh->disks, i;
- struct r5dev *dev;
-
- /* Now to look around and see what can be done */
- rcu_read_lock();
- spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
- for (i=disks; i--; ) {
- mdk_rdev_t *rdev;
-
- dev = &sh->dev[i];
-
- pr_debug("check %d: state 0x%lx toread %p read %p write %p "
- "written %p\n", i, dev->flags, dev->toread, dev->read,
- dev->towrite, dev->written);
-
- /* maybe we can request a biofill operation
- *
- * new wantfill requests are only permitted while
- * ops_complete_biofill is guaranteed to be inactive
- */
- if (test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags) && dev->toread &&
- !test_bit(STRIPE_BIOFILL_RUN, &sh->state))
- set_bit(R5_Wantfill, &dev->flags);
-
- /* now count some things */
- if (test_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags))
- s->locked++;
- if (test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags))
- s->uptodate++;
- if (test_bit(R5_Wantcompute, &dev->flags))
- s->compute++;
-
- if (test_bit(R5_Wantfill, &dev->flags))
- s->to_fill++;
- else if (dev->toread)
- s->to_read++;
- if (dev->towrite) {
- s->to_write++;
- if (!test_bit(R5_OVERWRITE, &dev->flags))
- s->non_overwrite++;
- }
- if (dev->written)
- s->written++;
- rdev = rcu_dereference(conf->disks[i].rdev);
- if (s->blocked_rdev == NULL &&
- rdev && unlikely(test_bit(Blocked, &rdev->flags))) {
- s->blocked_rdev = rdev;
- atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
- }
- clear_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags);
- if (!rdev)
- /* Not in-sync */;
- else if (test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags))
- set_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags);
- else {
- /* could be in-sync depending on recovery/reshape status */
- if (sh->sector + STRIPE_SECTORS <= rdev->recovery_offset)
- set_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags);
- }
- if (!test_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags)) {
- /* The ReadError flag will just be confusing now */
- clear_bit(R5_ReadError, &dev->flags);
- clear_bit(R5_ReWrite, &dev->flags);
- }
- if (test_bit(R5_ReadError, &dev->flags))
- clear_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags);
- if (!test_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags)) {
- if (s->failed < 2)
- s->failed_num[s->failed] = i;
- s->failed++;
- }
- }
- spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int handle_stripe6(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
+static void analyse_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
{
raid5_conf_t *conf = sh->raid_conf;
int disks = sh->disks;
@@ -2988,11 +2907,11 @@ static int handle_stripe6(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
int i;
/* Now to look around and see what can be done */
-
rcu_read_lock();
spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
for (i=disks; i--; ) {
mdk_rdev_t *rdev;
+
dev = &sh->dev[i];
pr_debug("check %d: state 0x%lx read %p write %p written %p\n",
@@ -3016,9 +2935,9 @@ static int handle_stripe6(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
BUG_ON(s->compute > 2);
}
- if (test_bit(R5_Wantfill, &dev->flags)) {
+ if (test_bit(R5_Wantfill, &dev->flags))
s->to_fill++;
- } else if (dev->toread)
+ else if (dev->toread)
s->to_read++;
if (dev->towrite) {
s->to_write++;
@@ -3058,14 +2977,11 @@ static int handle_stripe6(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
}
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
-
- return 0;
}
static void handle_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
{
struct stripe_head_state s;
- int done;
raid5_conf_t *conf = sh->raid_conf;
int i;
int prexor;
@@ -3099,13 +3015,7 @@ static void handle_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
s.failed_num[0] = -1;
s.failed_num[1] = -1;
- if (conf->level == 6)
- done = handle_stripe6(sh, &s);
- else
- done = handle_stripe5(sh, &s);
-
- if (done)
- goto finish;
+ analyse_stripe(sh, &s);
if (unlikely(s.blocked_rdev)) {
if (s.syncing || s.expanding || s.expanded ||
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-21 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-21 2:32 [md PATCH 00/34] md patches for 3.1 - part 1 NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 03/34] md/raid10: share pages between read and write bio's during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 02/34] md/raid10: factor out common bio handling code NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 01/34] md/raid10: get rid of duplicated conditional expression NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 09/34] md/raid5: move common code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22 4:30 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 10/34] md/raid5: unify stripe_head_state and r6_state NeilBrown
2011-07-22 4:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22 5:15 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22 5:37 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22 5:53 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 6:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 05/34] md/raid5: get rid of duplicated call to bio_data_dir() NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 08/34] md/raid5: replace sh->lock with an 'active' flag NeilBrown
2011-07-22 4:27 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22 4:49 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22 5:03 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-08-03 22:47 ` Dan Williams
2011-08-03 23:35 ` NeilBrown
2011-08-03 23:45 ` Williams, Dan J
2011-08-04 0:18 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 07/34] md/raid5: Protect some more code with ->device_lock NeilBrown
2011-07-22 3:54 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 04/34] md/raid5: use kmem_cache_zalloc() NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 11/34] md/raid5: add some more fields to stripe_head_state NeilBrown
2011-07-22 5:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 1:35 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 06/34] md/raid5: Remove use of sh->lock in sync_request NeilBrown
2011-07-22 3:39 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 19/34] md/raid5: move some more common code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22 9:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 1:59 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 13/34] md/raid5: Move code for finishing a reconstruction " NeilBrown
2011-07-22 7:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 1:44 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 12/34] md/raid5: move stripe_head_state and more code " NeilBrown
2011-07-22 5:41 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 17/34] md/raid5: unite handle_stripe_dirtying5 and handle_stripe_dirtying6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22 9:10 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 1:52 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26 2:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-26 9:40 ` David Brown
2011-07-26 13:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 15:01 ` David Brown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 18/34] md/raid5: move more common code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22 9:20 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 14/34] md/raid5: move more code into common handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22 7:32 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 1:48 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 15/34] md/raid5: rearrange a test in fetch_block6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22 7:37 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 16/34] md/raid5: unite fetch_block5 and fetch_block6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22 8:24 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 24/34] md: remove ro check in md_check_recovery() NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 22/34] md/raid: use printk_ratelimited instead of printk_ratelimit NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-07-22 9:36 ` [md PATCH 20/34] md/raid5: finalise new merged handle_stripe Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 2:02 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26 4:50 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 25/34] md: change managed of recovery_disabled NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 26/34] md/raid10: Make use of new recovery_disabled handling NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 21/34] md: use proper little-endian bitops NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 27/34] md/raid10: Improve decision on whether to fail a device with a read error NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 23/34] md: introduce link/unlink_rdev() helpers NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 31/34] md/raid10: move rdev->corrected_errors counting NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 34/34] MD bitmap: Revert DM dirty log hooks NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 33/34] MD: raid1 s/sysfs_notify_dirent/sysfs_notify_dirent_safe NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 32/34] md/raid5: Avoid BUG caused by multiple failures NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 28/34] md: get rid of unnecessary casts on page_address() NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 29/34] md/raid1: move rdev->corrected_errors counting NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 30/34] md/raid5: " NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110721023226.6728.78219.stgit@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).