linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [md PATCH 26/34] md/raid10: Make use of new recovery_disabled handling
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:32:27 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110721023227.6728.50267.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110721022537.6728.90204.stgit@notabene.brown>

When we get a read error during recovery, RAID10 previously
arranged for the recovering device to appear to fail so that
the recovery stops and doesn't restart.  This is misleading and wrong.

Instead, make use of the new recovery_disabled handling and mark
the target device and having recovery disabled.

Add appropriate checks in add_disk and remove_disk so that devices
are removed and not re-added when recovery is disabled.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---

 drivers/md/raid10.c |   62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 drivers/md/raid10.h |    5 ++++
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index 1725ec1..5583201 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -1099,7 +1099,6 @@ static int raid10_add_disk(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
 	conf_t *conf = mddev->private;
 	int err = -EEXIST;
 	int mirror;
-	mirror_info_t *p;
 	int first = 0;
 	int last = conf->raid_disks - 1;
 
@@ -1119,32 +1118,36 @@ static int raid10_add_disk(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
 		mirror = rdev->saved_raid_disk;
 	else
 		mirror = first;
-	for ( ; mirror <= last ; mirror++)
-		if ( !(p=conf->mirrors+mirror)->rdev) {
-
-			disk_stack_limits(mddev->gendisk, rdev->bdev,
-					  rdev->data_offset << 9);
-			/* as we don't honour merge_bvec_fn, we must
-			 * never risk violating it, so limit
-			 * ->max_segments to one lying with a single
-			 * page, as a one page request is never in
-			 * violation.
-			 */
-			if (rdev->bdev->bd_disk->queue->merge_bvec_fn) {
-				blk_queue_max_segments(mddev->queue, 1);
-				blk_queue_segment_boundary(mddev->queue,
-							   PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
-			}
+	for ( ; mirror <= last ; mirror++) {
+		mirror_info_t *p = &conf->mirrors[mirror];
+		if (p->recovery_disabled == mddev->recovery_disabled)
+			continue;
+		if (!p->rdev)
+			continue;
 
-			p->head_position = 0;
-			rdev->raid_disk = mirror;
-			err = 0;
-			if (rdev->saved_raid_disk != mirror)
-				conf->fullsync = 1;
-			rcu_assign_pointer(p->rdev, rdev);
-			break;
+		disk_stack_limits(mddev->gendisk, rdev->bdev,
+				  rdev->data_offset << 9);
+		/* as we don't honour merge_bvec_fn, we must
+		 * never risk violating it, so limit
+		 * ->max_segments to one lying with a single
+		 * page, as a one page request is never in
+		 * violation.
+		 */
+		if (rdev->bdev->bd_disk->queue->merge_bvec_fn) {
+			blk_queue_max_segments(mddev->queue, 1);
+			blk_queue_segment_boundary(mddev->queue,
+						   PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
 		}
 
+		p->head_position = 0;
+		rdev->raid_disk = mirror;
+		err = 0;
+		if (rdev->saved_raid_disk != mirror)
+			conf->fullsync = 1;
+		rcu_assign_pointer(p->rdev, rdev);
+		break;
+	}
+
 	md_integrity_add_rdev(rdev, mddev);
 	print_conf(conf);
 	return err;
@@ -1169,6 +1172,7 @@ static int raid10_remove_disk(mddev_t *mddev, int number)
 		 * is not possible.
 		 */
 		if (!test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags) &&
+		    mddev->recovery_disabled != p->recovery_disabled &&
 		    enough(conf)) {
 			err = -EBUSY;
 			goto abort;
@@ -1383,8 +1387,14 @@ static void recovery_request_write(mddev_t *mddev, r10bio_t *r10_bio)
 	md_sync_acct(conf->mirrors[d].rdev->bdev, wbio->bi_size >> 9);
 	if (test_bit(R10BIO_Uptodate, &r10_bio->state))
 		generic_make_request(wbio);
-	else
-		bio_endio(wbio, -EIO);
+	else {
+		printk(KERN_NOTICE
+		       "md/raid10:%s: recovery aborted due to read error\n",
+		       mdname(mddev));
+		conf->mirrors[d].recovery_disabled = mddev->recovery_disabled;
+		set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery);
+		bio_endio(wbio, 0);
+	}
 }
 
 
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.h b/drivers/md/raid10.h
index 944b110..a485914 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.h
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.h
@@ -6,6 +6,11 @@ typedef struct mirror_info mirror_info_t;
 struct mirror_info {
 	mdk_rdev_t	*rdev;
 	sector_t	head_position;
+	int		recovery_disabled;	/* matches
+						 * mddev->recovery_disabled
+						 * when we shouldn't try
+						 * recovering this device.
+						 */
 };
 
 typedef struct r10bio_s r10bio_t;



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-21  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-21  2:32 [md PATCH 00/34] md patches for 3.1 - part 1 NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 01/34] md/raid10: get rid of duplicated conditional expression NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 02/34] md/raid10: factor out common bio handling code NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 03/34] md/raid10: share pages between read and write bio's during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 05/34] md/raid5: get rid of duplicated call to bio_data_dir() NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 09/34] md/raid5: move common code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22  4:30   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 10/34] md/raid5: unify stripe_head_state and r6_state NeilBrown
2011-07-22  4:49   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22  5:15     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22  5:37       ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22  5:53         ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  6:44           ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 04/34] md/raid5: use kmem_cache_zalloc() NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 07/34] md/raid5: Protect some more code with ->device_lock NeilBrown
2011-07-22  3:54   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 08/34] md/raid5: replace sh->lock with an 'active' flag NeilBrown
2011-07-22  4:27   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22  4:49     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22  5:03       ` Namhyung Kim
2011-08-03 22:47   ` Dan Williams
2011-08-03 23:35     ` NeilBrown
2011-08-03 23:45       ` Williams, Dan J
2011-08-04  0:18         ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 06/34] md/raid5: Remove use of sh->lock in sync_request NeilBrown
2011-07-22  3:39   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 11/34] md/raid5: add some more fields to stripe_head_state NeilBrown
2011-07-22  5:31   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  1:35     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 18/34] md/raid5: move more common code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22  9:20   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 17/34] md/raid5: unite handle_stripe_dirtying5 and handle_stripe_dirtying6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22  9:10   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  1:52     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26  2:41       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-26  9:40       ` David Brown
2011-07-26 13:23         ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 15:01           ` David Brown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 12/34] md/raid5: move stripe_head_state and more code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22  5:41   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 13/34] md/raid5: Move code for finishing a reconstruction " NeilBrown
2011-07-22  7:09   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  1:44     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 19/34] md/raid5: move some more common code " NeilBrown
2011-07-22  9:29   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  1:59     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 16/34] md/raid5: unite fetch_block5 and fetch_block6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22  8:24   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 14/34] md/raid5: move more code into common handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22  7:32   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  1:48     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 15/34] md/raid5: rearrange a test in fetch_block6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22  7:37   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 20/34] md/raid5: finalise new merged handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22  9:36   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  2:02     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26  4:50       ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 25/34] md: change managed of recovery_disabled NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 22/34] md/raid: use printk_ratelimited instead of printk_ratelimit NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 24/34] md: remove ro check in md_check_recovery() NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 23/34] md: introduce link/unlink_rdev() helpers NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 27/34] md/raid10: Improve decision on whether to fail a device with a read error NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 21/34] md: use proper little-endian bitops NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 32/34] md/raid5: Avoid BUG caused by multiple failures NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 33/34] MD: raid1 s/sysfs_notify_dirent/sysfs_notify_dirent_safe NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 34/34] MD bitmap: Revert DM dirty log hooks NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 31/34] md/raid10: move rdev->corrected_errors counting NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 30/34] md/raid5: " NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 29/34] md/raid1: " NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 28/34] md: get rid of unnecessary casts on page_address() NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110721023227.6728.50267.stgit@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).