From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [md PATCH 25/34] md: change managed of recovery_disabled.
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:32:27 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110721023227.6728.61339.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110721022537.6728.90204.stgit@notabene.brown>
If we hit a read error while recovering a mirror, we want to abort the
recovery without necessarily failing the disk - as having a disk this
a read error is better than not having an array at all.
Currently this is managed with a per-array flag "recovery_disabled"
and is only implemented for RAID1. For RAID10 we will need finer
grained control as we might want to disable recovery for individual
devices separately.
So push more of the decision making into the personality.
'recovery_disabled' is now a 'cookie' which is copied when the
personality want to disable recovery and is changed when a device is
added to the array as this is used as a trigger to 'try recovery
again'.
This will allow RAID10 to get the control that it needs.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/md.c | 4 ++--
drivers/md/md.h | 9 ++++++---
drivers/md/raid1.c | 7 +++++--
drivers/md/raid1.h | 6 ++++++
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 77bd8d8..c7d9c6a 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -1922,7 +1922,7 @@ static int bind_rdev_to_array(mdk_rdev_t * rdev, mddev_t * mddev)
bd_link_disk_holder(rdev->bdev, mddev->gendisk);
/* May as well allow recovery to be retried once */
- mddev->recovery_disabled = 0;
+ mddev->recovery_disabled++;
return 0;
@@ -7070,7 +7070,7 @@ static int remove_and_add_spares(mddev_t *mddev)
}
}
- if (mddev->degraded && !mddev->recovery_disabled) {
+ if (mddev->degraded) {
list_for_each_entry(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set) {
if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
!test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) &&
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
index 6863f72..de5455d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.h
+++ b/drivers/md/md.h
@@ -239,9 +239,12 @@ struct mddev_s
#define MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN 9
unsigned long recovery;
- int recovery_disabled; /* if we detect that recovery
- * will always fail, set this
- * so we don't loop trying */
+ /* If a RAID personality determines that recovery (of a particular
+ * device) will fail due to a read error on the source device, it
+ * takes a copy of this number and does not attempt recovery again
+ * until this number changes.
+ */
+ int recovery_disabled;
int in_sync; /* know to not need resync */
/* 'open_mutex' avoids races between 'md_open' and 'do_md_stop', so
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
index 1d79a04..44069b3 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
@@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ static void error(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
* However don't try a recovery from this drive as
* it is very likely to fail.
*/
- mddev->recovery_disabled = 1;
+ conf->recovery_disabled = mddev->recovery_disabled;
return;
}
if (test_and_clear_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags)) {
@@ -1052,6 +1052,9 @@ static int raid1_add_disk(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
int first = 0;
int last = mddev->raid_disks - 1;
+ if (mddev->recovery_disabled == conf->recovery_disabled)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0)
first = last = rdev->raid_disk;
@@ -1107,7 +1110,7 @@ static int raid1_remove_disk(mddev_t *mddev, int number)
* is not possible.
*/
if (!test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags) &&
- !mddev->recovery_disabled &&
+ mddev->recovery_disabled != conf->recovery_disabled &&
mddev->degraded < conf->raid_disks) {
err = -EBUSY;
goto abort;
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.h b/drivers/md/raid1.h
index e743a64..3cd18cf 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid1.h
+++ b/drivers/md/raid1.h
@@ -48,6 +48,12 @@ struct r1_private_data_s {
* (fresh device added).
* Cleared when a sync completes.
*/
+ int recovery_disabled; /* when the same as
+ * mddev->recovery_disabled
+ * we don't allow recovery
+ * to be attempted as we
+ * expect a read error
+ */
wait_queue_head_t wait_barrier;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-21 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-21 2:32 [md PATCH 00/34] md patches for 3.1 - part 1 NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 02/34] md/raid10: factor out common bio handling code NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 01/34] md/raid10: get rid of duplicated conditional expression NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 03/34] md/raid10: share pages between read and write bio's during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 10/34] md/raid5: unify stripe_head_state and r6_state NeilBrown
2011-07-22 4:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22 5:15 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22 5:37 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22 5:53 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 6:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 09/34] md/raid5: move common code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22 4:30 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 05/34] md/raid5: get rid of duplicated call to bio_data_dir() NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 04/34] md/raid5: use kmem_cache_zalloc() NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 08/34] md/raid5: replace sh->lock with an 'active' flag NeilBrown
2011-07-22 4:27 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22 4:49 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22 5:03 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-08-03 22:47 ` Dan Williams
2011-08-03 23:35 ` NeilBrown
2011-08-03 23:45 ` Williams, Dan J
2011-08-04 0:18 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 07/34] md/raid5: Protect some more code with ->device_lock NeilBrown
2011-07-22 3:54 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 11/34] md/raid5: add some more fields to stripe_head_state NeilBrown
2011-07-22 5:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 1:35 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 06/34] md/raid5: Remove use of sh->lock in sync_request NeilBrown
2011-07-22 3:39 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 13/34] md/raid5: Move code for finishing a reconstruction into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22 7:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 1:44 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 19/34] md/raid5: move some more common code " NeilBrown
2011-07-22 9:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 1:59 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 12/34] md/raid5: move stripe_head_state and more " NeilBrown
2011-07-22 5:41 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 17/34] md/raid5: unite handle_stripe_dirtying5 and handle_stripe_dirtying6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22 9:10 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 1:52 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26 2:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-26 9:40 ` David Brown
2011-07-26 13:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 15:01 ` David Brown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 18/34] md/raid5: move more common code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22 9:20 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 15/34] md/raid5: rearrange a test in fetch_block6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22 7:37 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 14/34] md/raid5: move more code into common handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22 7:32 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 1:48 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 16/34] md/raid5: unite fetch_block5 and fetch_block6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22 8:24 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 24/34] md: remove ro check in md_check_recovery() NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 20/34] md/raid5: finalise new merged handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22 9:36 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 2:02 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26 4:50 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 22/34] md/raid: use printk_ratelimited instead of printk_ratelimit NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 26/34] md/raid10: Make use of new recovery_disabled handling NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 21/34] md: use proper little-endian bitops NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 27/34] md/raid10: Improve decision on whether to fail a device with a read error NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 23/34] md: introduce link/unlink_rdev() helpers NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 34/34] MD bitmap: Revert DM dirty log hooks NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 31/34] md/raid10: move rdev->corrected_errors counting NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 33/34] MD: raid1 s/sysfs_notify_dirent/sysfs_notify_dirent_safe NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 32/34] md/raid5: Avoid BUG caused by multiple failures NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 28/34] md: get rid of unnecessary casts on page_address() NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 29/34] md/raid1: move rdev->corrected_errors counting NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 30/34] md/raid5: " NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110721023227.6728.61339.stgit@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).