From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [md PATCH 27/34] md/raid10: Improve decision on whether to fail a device with a read error.
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:32:27 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110721023227.6728.78076.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110721022537.6728.90204.stgit@notabene.brown>
Normally we would fail a device with a READ error. However if doing
so causes the array to fail, it is better to leave the device
in place and just return the read error to the caller.
The current test for decide if the array will fail is overly
simplistic.
We have a function 'enough' which can tell if the array is failed or
not, so use it to guide the decision.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/raid10.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index 5583201..6721cb0 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -970,6 +970,30 @@ static void status(struct seq_file *seq, mddev_t *mddev)
seq_printf(seq, "]");
}
+/* check if there are enough drives for
+ * every block to appear on atleast one.
+ * Don't consider the device numbered 'ignore'
+ * as we might be about to remove it.
+ */
+static int enough(conf_t *conf, int ignore)
+{
+ int first = 0;
+
+ do {
+ int n = conf->copies;
+ int cnt = 0;
+ while (n--) {
+ if (conf->mirrors[first].rdev &&
+ first != ignore)
+ cnt++;
+ first = (first+1) % conf->raid_disks;
+ }
+ if (cnt == 0)
+ return 0;
+ } while (first != 0);
+ return 1;
+}
+
static void error(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
{
char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
@@ -982,13 +1006,9 @@ static void error(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
* else mark the drive as failed
*/
if (test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags)
- && conf->raid_disks-mddev->degraded == 1)
+ && !enough(conf, rdev->raid_disk))
/*
* Don't fail the drive, just return an IO error.
- * The test should really be more sophisticated than
- * "working_disks == 1", but it isn't critical, and
- * can wait until we do more sophisticated "is the drive
- * really dead" tests...
*/
return;
if (test_and_clear_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags)) {
@@ -1043,27 +1063,6 @@ static void close_sync(conf_t *conf)
conf->r10buf_pool = NULL;
}
-/* check if there are enough drives for
- * every block to appear on atleast one
- */
-static int enough(conf_t *conf)
-{
- int first = 0;
-
- do {
- int n = conf->copies;
- int cnt = 0;
- while (n--) {
- if (conf->mirrors[first].rdev)
- cnt++;
- first = (first+1) % conf->raid_disks;
- }
- if (cnt == 0)
- return 0;
- } while (first != 0);
- return 1;
-}
-
static int raid10_spare_active(mddev_t *mddev)
{
int i;
@@ -1107,7 +1106,7 @@ static int raid10_add_disk(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
* very different from resync
*/
return -EBUSY;
- if (!enough(conf))
+ if (!enough(conf, -1))
return -EINVAL;
if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0)
@@ -1173,7 +1172,7 @@ static int raid10_remove_disk(mddev_t *mddev, int number)
*/
if (!test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags) &&
mddev->recovery_disabled != p->recovery_disabled &&
- enough(conf)) {
+ enough(conf, -1)) {
err = -EBUSY;
goto abort;
}
@@ -2286,7 +2285,7 @@ static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
disk->head_position = 0;
}
/* need to check that every block has at least one working mirror */
- if (!enough(conf)) {
+ if (!enough(conf, -1)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "md/raid10:%s: not enough operational mirrors.\n",
mdname(mddev));
goto out_free_conf;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-21 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-21 2:32 [md PATCH 00/34] md patches for 3.1 - part 1 NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 02/34] md/raid10: factor out common bio handling code NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 01/34] md/raid10: get rid of duplicated conditional expression NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 03/34] md/raid10: share pages between read and write bio's during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 11/34] md/raid5: add some more fields to stripe_head_state NeilBrown
2011-07-22 5:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 1:35 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 06/34] md/raid5: Remove use of sh->lock in sync_request NeilBrown
2011-07-22 3:39 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 04/34] md/raid5: use kmem_cache_zalloc() NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 07/34] md/raid5: Protect some more code with ->device_lock NeilBrown
2011-07-22 3:54 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 08/34] md/raid5: replace sh->lock with an 'active' flag NeilBrown
2011-07-22 4:27 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22 4:49 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22 5:03 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-08-03 22:47 ` Dan Williams
2011-08-03 23:35 ` NeilBrown
2011-08-03 23:45 ` Williams, Dan J
2011-08-04 0:18 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 10/34] md/raid5: unify stripe_head_state and r6_state NeilBrown
2011-07-22 4:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22 5:15 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22 5:37 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22 5:53 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 6:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 09/34] md/raid5: move common code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22 4:30 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 05/34] md/raid5: get rid of duplicated call to bio_data_dir() NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 16/34] md/raid5: unite fetch_block5 and fetch_block6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22 8:24 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 14/34] md/raid5: move more code into common handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22 7:32 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 1:48 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 15/34] md/raid5: rearrange a test in fetch_block6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22 7:37 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 13/34] md/raid5: Move code for finishing a reconstruction into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22 7:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 1:44 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 19/34] md/raid5: move some more common code " NeilBrown
2011-07-22 9:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 1:59 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 17/34] md/raid5: unite handle_stripe_dirtying5 and handle_stripe_dirtying6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22 9:10 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 1:52 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26 2:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-26 9:40 ` David Brown
2011-07-26 13:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 15:01 ` David Brown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 18/34] md/raid5: move more common code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22 9:20 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 12/34] md/raid5: move stripe_head_state and more " NeilBrown
2011-07-22 5:41 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 21/34] md: use proper little-endian bitops NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 23/34] md: introduce link/unlink_rdev() helpers NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 26/34] md/raid10: Make use of new recovery_disabled handling NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 24/34] md: remove ro check in md_check_recovery() NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 20/34] md/raid5: finalise new merged handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22 9:36 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 2:02 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26 4:50 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 25/34] md: change managed of recovery_disabled NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 22/34] md/raid: use printk_ratelimited instead of printk_ratelimit NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 29/34] md/raid1: move rdev->corrected_errors counting NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 28/34] md: get rid of unnecessary casts on page_address() NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 30/34] md/raid5: move rdev->corrected_errors counting NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 34/34] MD bitmap: Revert DM dirty log hooks NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 31/34] md/raid10: move rdev->corrected_errors counting NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 33/34] MD: raid1 s/sysfs_notify_dirent/sysfs_notify_dirent_safe NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:32 ` [md PATCH 32/34] md/raid5: Avoid BUG caused by multiple failures NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110721023227.6728.78076.stgit@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).