From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pol Hallen <raid1@fuckaround.org>
Subject: Re: standard performance (write speed ??Mb/s) - new raid5 array
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:08:28 +0200
Message-ID: <201107220908.28819.raid1@fuckaround.org>
References: <201107162140.58883.raid1@fuckaround.org> <201107211907.36864.raid1@fuckaround.org> <4E28BEC3.4000301@hardwarefreak.com>
Reply-To: polhallen@fuckaround.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E28BEC3.4000301@hardwarefreak.com>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

> Why did you create partitions?  The whole point of zeroing the first 512
> bytes was to *eliminate* all the partitions...

Follow the post of Erwan Leroux, he advise creare a new partition with non-fs  
data :-/

> No, you did not.  It seems you merged bits and pieces from each array
> creation method.  The array may still function properly.  I've never
> tried what you've done here.  Maybe others have the correct answer.

I wish it's everything ok :-)

Pol