linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [md PATCH 10/34] md/raid5: unify stripe_head_state and r6_state
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:37:46 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110722153746.0f58c356@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110722151506.54c66e82@notabene.brown>

On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:15:06 +1000 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:49:37 +0900 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> > > @@ -2964,7 +2964,7 @@ static void handle_stripe_expansion(raid5_conf_t *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
> > >  			set_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &sh2->dev[dd_idx].flags);
> > >  			for (j = 0; j < conf->raid_disks; j++)
> > >  				if (j != sh2->pd_idx &&
> > > -				    (!r6s || j != sh2->qd_idx) &&
> > > +				    (r6s || j != sh2->qd_idx) &&
> > 
> > Why is this changed?
> > 
> 
> No good reason that I can think of ... so must be a bug.  I'll fix it.
> 
> In the current code, r6s is always NULL! which is also a bug.
> When you get to
> 
>    md/raid5: Move code for finishing a reconstruction into handle_stripe.
> 
> You'll find that the call which passed 's' in was changed to pass 'NULL' in
> when merging the RAID5 and RAID6 code.  I'll fix that too.
> 

To be specific:

1/ I removed the hunk that you noticed above.
2/ I added the following patch.
3/ I made the obvious changes to the subsequent patch so that it would still
   apply.

This is all now in my for-next branch (I haven't added the Reviewed-by's -
I'll do them all together later.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

From 74721b68b4cf8d4845aa9efa3daf99247a611b70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:29:38 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] md/raid5: Remove stripe_head_state arg from handle_stripe_expansion.

This arg is only used to differentiate between RAID5 and RAID6 but
that is not needed.  For RAID5, raid5_compute_sector will set qd_idx
to "~0" so j with certainly not equals qd_idx, so there is no need
for a guard on that condition.

So remove the guard and remove the arg from the declaration and
callers of handle_stripe_expansion.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 36873cf..793dd76 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2921,8 +2921,7 @@ static void handle_parity_checks6(raid5_conf_t *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
 	}
 }
 
-static void handle_stripe_expansion(raid5_conf_t *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
-				    struct stripe_head_state *r6s)
+static void handle_stripe_expansion(raid5_conf_t *conf, struct stripe_head *sh)
 {
 	int i;
 
@@ -2964,7 +2963,7 @@ static void handle_stripe_expansion(raid5_conf_t *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
 			set_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &sh2->dev[dd_idx].flags);
 			for (j = 0; j < conf->raid_disks; j++)
 				if (j != sh2->pd_idx &&
-				    (!r6s || j != sh2->qd_idx) &&
+				    j != sh2->qd_idx &&
 				    !test_bit(R5_Expanded, &sh2->dev[j].flags))
 					break;
 			if (j == conf->raid_disks) {
@@ -3249,7 +3248,7 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
 
 	if (s->expanding && s->locked == 0 &&
 	    !test_bit(STRIPE_COMPUTE_RUN, &sh->state))
-		handle_stripe_expansion(conf, sh, NULL);
+		handle_stripe_expansion(conf, sh);
 }
 
 static void handle_stripe6(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
@@ -3512,7 +3511,7 @@ static void handle_stripe6(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
 
 	if (s->expanding && s->locked == 0 &&
 	    !test_bit(STRIPE_COMPUTE_RUN, &sh->state))
-		handle_stripe_expansion(conf, sh, s);
+		handle_stripe_expansion(conf, sh);
 }
 
 static void handle_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-22  5:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-21  2:32 [md PATCH 00/34] md patches for 3.1 - part 1 NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 03/34] md/raid10: share pages between read and write bio's during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 01/34] md/raid10: get rid of duplicated conditional expression NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 02/34] md/raid10: factor out common bio handling code NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 06/34] md/raid5: Remove use of sh->lock in sync_request NeilBrown
2011-07-22  3:39   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 11/34] md/raid5: add some more fields to stripe_head_state NeilBrown
2011-07-22  5:31   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  1:35     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 07/34] md/raid5: Protect some more code with ->device_lock NeilBrown
2011-07-22  3:54   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 08/34] md/raid5: replace sh->lock with an 'active' flag NeilBrown
2011-07-22  4:27   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22  4:49     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22  5:03       ` Namhyung Kim
2011-08-03 22:47   ` Dan Williams
2011-08-03 23:35     ` NeilBrown
2011-08-03 23:45       ` Williams, Dan J
2011-08-04  0:18         ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 04/34] md/raid5: use kmem_cache_zalloc() NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 05/34] md/raid5: get rid of duplicated call to bio_data_dir() NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 09/34] md/raid5: move common code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22  4:30   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 10/34] md/raid5: unify stripe_head_state and r6_state NeilBrown
2011-07-22  4:49   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22  5:15     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-22  5:37       ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-07-22  5:53         ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  6:44           ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 16/34] md/raid5: unite fetch_block5 and fetch_block6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22  8:24   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 14/34] md/raid5: move more code into common handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22  7:32   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  1:48     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 15/34] md/raid5: rearrange a test in fetch_block6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22  7:37   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 18/34] md/raid5: move more common code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22  9:20   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 17/34] md/raid5: unite handle_stripe_dirtying5 and handle_stripe_dirtying6 NeilBrown
2011-07-22  9:10   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  1:52     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26  2:41       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-26  9:40       ` David Brown
2011-07-26 13:23         ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 15:01           ` David Brown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 12/34] md/raid5: move stripe_head_state and more code into handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22  5:41   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 19/34] md/raid5: move some more common " NeilBrown
2011-07-22  9:29   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  1:59     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 13/34] md/raid5: Move code for finishing a reconstruction " NeilBrown
2011-07-22  7:09   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  1:44     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 23/34] md: introduce link/unlink_rdev() helpers NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 27/34] md/raid10: Improve decision on whether to fail a device with a read error NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 21/34] md: use proper little-endian bitops NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 26/34] md/raid10: Make use of new recovery_disabled handling NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 22/34] md/raid: use printk_ratelimited instead of printk_ratelimit NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 25/34] md: change managed of recovery_disabled NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 20/34] md/raid5: finalise new merged handle_stripe NeilBrown
2011-07-22  9:36   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  2:02     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26  4:50       ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 24/34] md: remove ro check in md_check_recovery() NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 30/34] md/raid5: move rdev->corrected_errors counting NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 29/34] md/raid1: " NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 28/34] md: get rid of unnecessary casts on page_address() NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 32/34] md/raid5: Avoid BUG caused by multiple failures NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 33/34] MD: raid1 s/sysfs_notify_dirent/sysfs_notify_dirent_safe NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 31/34] md/raid10: move rdev->corrected_errors counting NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:32 ` [md PATCH 34/34] MD bitmap: Revert DM dirty log hooks NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110722153746.0f58c356@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).