From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc1 (nfs/pnfs and drivers/md) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:58:29 -0700 Message-ID: <20110810175829.a834d80f.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <20110810122304.96b8be67.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peng Tao Cc: Linus Torvalds , Trond Myklebust , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:35:50 +0800 Peng Tao wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > When CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled (x86_64): > > > > warning: (NFS_V4_1) selects MD which has unmet direct dependencies (BLOCK) > MD depends on BLOCK but when MD is selected, it will not select BLOCK. > Selecting BLOCK at NFS_V4_1 can solve this but it's like resolving > dependency from top down. > > Is MD designed to not be selected from the first place? If not, can we > change it to selecting BLOCK? Hopefully MD will not select BLOCK. The blocklayout parts of NVS_V4_1 could depend on BLOCK. or all of NVS_V4_1 can depend on BLOCK. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***