From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Mamedov Subject: Re: RAID6 issues Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:29:51 +0600 Message-ID: <20110913162951.6b4297db@natsu> References: <20110913082511.3c34dec9@notabene.brown> <20110913084419.380babcc@notabene.brown> <20110913093850.606efa70@notabene.brown> <20110913144424.64348c41@natsu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/hy0di3LOsiWFpt4noF4qajf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andriano Cc: NeilBrown , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/hy0di3LOsiWFpt4noF4qajf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:05:41 +1000 Andriano wrote: > Connected one of the offenders to HBA port, and hdparm outputs this: >=20 > #hdparm -N /dev/sdh >=20 > /dev/sdh: > max sectors =3D 3907027055/14715056(18446744073321613488?), HPA > setting seems invalid (buggy kernel device driver?) You could just try "hdparm -N p3907029168" (capacity of the 'larger' disks)= , but that could fail if the device driver is indeed buggy. Another possible course of action would be to try that on some other contro= ller. For example on your motherboard you have two violet ports, http://www.gigab= yte.ru/products/upload/products/1470/100a.jpg those are managed by the JMicron JMB363 controller, try plugging the disks = which need HPA to be removed to those ports, AFAIR that JMicron controller = works with "hdparm -N" just fine. --=20 With respect, Roman --Sig_/hy0di3LOsiWFpt4noF4qajf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk5vMJ8ACgkQTLKSvz+PZwiojwCfQFqG5p8VPiJ+yt3XIoKeqSUU hM0An0VioNnw572LI/MQFBkvUI+dsB38 =JKgy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/hy0di3LOsiWFpt4noF4qajf--