From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Mamedov Subject: Re: potentially lost largeish raid5 array.. Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:58:34 +0600 Message-ID: <20110923105834.71fc7c78@natsu> References: <201109221950.36910.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> <20110923143210.583e11ec@notabene.brown> <201109222249.12892.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/tI4KVlbzW9AuHbYR=sLKXH9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201109222249.12892.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Fjellstrom Cc: NeilBrown , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/tI4KVlbzW9AuHbYR=sLKXH9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:49:12 -0600 Thomas Fjellstrom wrote: > Now I guess the question is, how to get that last drive back in? would:=20 >=20 > mdadm --re-add /dev/md1 /dev/sdi=20 >=20 > work? It should, or at least it will not harm anything, but keep in mind that sim= ply trying to continue using the array (raid5 with a largeish member count)= on a flaky controller card is akin to playing with fire. --=20 With respect, Roman --Sig_/tI4KVlbzW9AuHbYR=sLKXH9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk58EfoACgkQTLKSvz+PZwjuMQCgjLvyHMCSHh9N3itpt3eA+ZPb uhoAnj8YmR/vA5rYinKATNx/TnNstLJw =bB4R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/tI4KVlbzW9AuHbYR=sLKXH9--