From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Subject: Re: Recovery of failed RAID 6 and LVM Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:15:30 +1100 Message-ID: <20111005131530.1899e20f@notabene.brown> References: <4E7EDE58.3000804@yazzy.org> <20110926074002.6399de56@notabene.brown> <4E7FA3E8.5010603@yazzy.org> <20110926081853.2819622b@notabene.brown> <4E804062.3020700@yazzy.org> <20110926193130.6377f5b9@notabene.brown> <4E82203A.60507@yazzy.org> <20110928091335.1df35f8e@notabene.brown> <4E828B92.40502@hardwarefreak.com> <4E82C862.8000705@yazzy.org> <4E834758.2090508@hardwarefreak.com> <20110929094910.2c44ff8a@notabene.brown> <20110930090720.57534d81@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/V3t2TztuR6HN8yPS_pR195l"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Williams, Dan J" Cc: stan@hardwarefreak.com, lists@yazzy.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/V3t2TztuR6HN8yPS_pR195l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:18:45 -0700 "Williams, Dan J" wrote: > It simply sounds like you want a similar situation like what happened > with git. I.e. a "Junio" to take over but you'll still be around to > course correct and send patches. That isn't necessary in the first instance. It could possibly (hopefully) reach that stage, but taking over as maintainer is a big ask and not something to be expected in a hurry. I'm happy to start small. NeilBrown --Sig_/V3t2TztuR6HN8yPS_pR195l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFOi73CG5fc6gV+Wb0RAs7NAJ95iafQQ1mjHoZ5L/UtOQ99166F1QCeNZ0D d32Zu1iabjc322erlAKJ0mA= =f3z8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/V3t2TztuR6HN8yPS_pR195l--