From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Truschnigg Subject: Re: possibly silly question (raid failover) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 09:26:59 +0000 Message-ID: <20111101092659.GA12805@vault> References: <4EAF3F78.5060900@meetinghouse.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EAF3F78.5060900@meetinghouse.net> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Miles Fidelman Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-raid.ids --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Miles, On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 08:38:16PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Hi Folks, >=20 > I've been exploring various ways to build a "poor man's high > availability cluster." Currently I'm running two nodes, using raid > on each box, running DRBD across the boxes, and running Xen virtual > machines on top of that. > [...] while I do note that I don't answer your question at hand, I'm still inclin= ed to ask if you do know Ganeti (http://code.google.com/p/ganeti/) yet? It off= ers pretty much everything you seem to want to have. --=20 with best regards: - Johannes Truschnigg ( johannes@truschnigg.info ) www: http://johannes.truschnigg.info/ phone: +43 650 2 133337 xmpp: johannes@truschnigg.info Please do not bother me with HTML-eMail or attachments. Thank you. --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk6vu2MACgkQnnUApj8OcoIvpACfSX1sIjGgfHsWBAuRodE8XTor T3QAnAnlSgHiX3OOjbvSstDJ8RG5g2XX =KmbY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--