linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Hill <robin@robinhill.me.uk>
To: William Colls <william.colls@rogers.com>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 16:39:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111109163933.GA26630@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EBAA68B.6090906@rogers.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3932 bytes --]

On Wed Nov 09, 2011 at 11:12:59AM -0500, William Colls wrote:

> 
> Environment
> 
> Kubuntu Linux 10.04.3 LTS
> mdadm 2.6.7.1-1ubuntu15
> 
> I have two identical disks that were in a raid configuration in another 
> machine (also running 10.04). I removed them from the old machine, 
> mounted them in a new machine, booted up, and at a terminal prompt as 
> root issued
> 
> mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc
> 
You should have just assembled them. You've now created a new array
instead of just assembling the old one.

> The configuration in the old machine was raid 1.
> 
> I checked the contents of /proc/mdstat and it confirmed that md0 was 
> indeed running, with 2 devices, as expected. But it also said it was 
> resyncing the disks, which I didn't expect.
> 
> When the reync completed, I was unable to mount /dev/md0p1. Specifying 
> -t ext3 in the mount command gives the error message "wrong fs, bad 
> option, bad superblock on /dev/md0p1". Trying mount with no -t gives the 
> error "unknown file type linux_raid_member". Looking at the disks with 
> Gparted, confims that the system sees the disks, but the filesystem 
> shows as unknown.
> 
It would look like the old array was either created with an older mdadm
version (with different defaults) or used some non-default parameter
values.

> The output from mdamd --detail /dev/sdb
> 
> /dev/sdb:
>            Magic : a92b4efc
>          Version : 00.90.00
>             UUID : 1443e74d:f63f16ab:d527ef8c:7225e0b0
>    Creation Time : Tue Nov  8 13:14:48 2011
>       Raid Level : raid1
>    Used Dev Size : 732574464 (698.64 GiB 750.16 GB)
>       Array Size : 732574464 (698.64 GiB 750.16 GB)
>     Raid Devices : 2
>    Total Devices : 2
> Preferred Minor : 0
> 
>      Update Time : Tue Nov  8 16:05:42 2011
>            State : clean
>   Active Devices : 2
> Working Devices : 2
>   Failed Devices : 0
>    Spare Devices : 0
>         Checksum : c4195c85 - correct
>           Events : 34
> 
> 
>        Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
> this     0       8       16        0      active sync   /dev/sdb
> 
>     0     0       8       16        0      active sync   /dev/sdb
>     1     1       8       32        1      active sync   /dev/sdc
> 
> --- end of output
> 
> Output from mdadm --examine /dev/sdc
> 
> /dev/sdc:
>            Magic : a92b4efc
>          Version : 00.90.00
>             UUID : 1443e74d:f63f16ab:d527ef8c:7225e0b0
>    Creation Time : Tue Nov  8 13:14:48 2011
>       Raid Level : raid1
>    Used Dev Size : 732574464 (698.64 GiB 750.16 GB)
>       Array Size : 732574464 (698.64 GiB 750.16 GB)
>     Raid Devices : 2
>    Total Devices : 2
> Preferred Minor : 0
> 
>      Update Time : Tue Nov  8 16:05:42 2011
>            State : clean
>   Active Devices : 2
> Working Devices : 2
>   Failed Devices : 0
>    Spare Devices : 0
>         Checksum : c4195c97 - correct
>           Events : 34
> 
> 
>        Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
> this     1       8       32        1      active sync   /dev/sdc
> 
>     0     0       8       16        0      active sync   /dev/sdb
>     1     1       8       32        1      active sync   /dev/sdc
> 
> ---- end of output
> 
> So - am I truly up the creek without a paddle? Is there any way to 
> recover this array? I have backups of most of it, but it will take a 
> while to find and restore. And for sure something will be lost.
> 

Certainly most of the data should be there still. I don't suppose you
have a copy of the mdadm --examine output from the old system at all?

Cheers,
    Robin
-- 
     ___        
    ( ' }     |       Robin Hill        <robin@robinhill.me.uk> |
   / / )      | Little Jim says ....                            |
  // !!       |      "He fallen in de water !!"                 |

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-09 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-09 16:12 Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type William Colls
2011-11-09 16:39 ` Robin Hill [this message]
2011-11-09 17:12   ` William Colls
2011-11-09 18:55     ` Phil Turmel
2011-11-09 19:57       ` William Colls
2011-11-09 20:05         ` Phil Turmel
     [not found]           ` <4EBAE90F.2030104@rogers.com>
2011-11-09 21:45             ` Phil Turmel
2011-11-10  3:36               ` William Colls
2011-11-10  3:57                 ` Phil Turmel
2011-11-10 15:23                   ` William Colls
2011-11-10 15:48                     ` Phil Turmel
2011-11-10 16:12                       ` John Robinson
2011-11-10 16:32                         ` Phil Turmel
2011-11-14 15:01                           ` William Colls
2011-11-10  8:53                 ` Robin Hill
2011-11-09 17:07 ` Gordon Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111109163933.GA26630@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk \
    --to=robin@robinhill.me.uk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=william.colls@rogers.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).