From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: wilsonjonathan <piercing_male@hotmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linear raid, is partial recovery possible?
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 07:46:37 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111129074637.5a7d3371@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP248DE7134BCABFEB83181BD98B20@phx.gbl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1795 bytes --]
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:06:35 +0000 wilsonjonathan <piercing_male@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Quick question regarding linear raid.
>
> If a disk fails on a linear raid I understand how the raid is
> non-recoverable, as a whole, as it has lost a chunk of data.
>
> However is it possible to recover the data from the non-failed portion
> of the raid as I assume linear works by starting at one end of the array
> and slowly progresses to the other?
>
> Or perhaps it is dependent on the file system on the array, eg. ext
> works by trying to place files distant to each other to help reduce the
> possibility of fragmentation?
>
> Perhaps the filesystem meta data, or some portion, may span between two
> physical drives which would corrupt its table?
>
> And obviously if a file spans two disks it would be missing part of its
> data?
Yes.
>
> Does the raid underlying a file system do its own things, re-space,
> physical data layout, etc; or does/can a file system impact on the
> workings of an array?
It is entirely up to the filesystem. The RAID just catenates the spaces
together into one big space. The filesystem decides where in that space to
put all the different things it wants to write.
If you loose one drive from a linear array then recovery would be very
difficult and have no guarantees.
>
> The more I look into software raid the more fasinated I become with it
> and its inner workings. While its way beyond me in some of the maths and
> the fact I am un-proficient in C it has really caught my intrigue, and
> all because I wanted to set up a small home server ;-)
>
That's just the beginning -- before you know it you will be studying the
maths and learning more C - you won't be able to help yourself!
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-28 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-28 20:06 linear raid, is partial recovery possible? wilsonjonathan
2011-11-28 20:46 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-11-28 20:51 ` Robin Hill
2011-11-28 22:08 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-11-28 22:00 ` Stan Hoeppner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111129074637.5a7d3371@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piercing_male@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).