Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@satx.rr.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is this stupid?
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 17:01:14 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111205170114.49cf7437@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D4.5D.10364.904FBDE4@cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1451 bytes --]

On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 16:28:25 -0600 "Leslie Rhorer" <lrhorer@satx.rr.com> wrote:

> I have a system - one that is not expandable - that has relatively limited
> RAM, comparatively speaking, and must boot from a usb stick.  The system
> hosts a RAID array, but one cannot assume the RAID array is available when
> the system boots.  IOW, I want to be able to take down the RAID array for
> maintenance, possibly booting the system with no array created, at all.
> 
> On the other hand, USB sticks have a limited number of writes available
> before they fail, so I don't want the system to be thrashing the flash drive
> any more than necessary.  At this time,  I have /var/run, /var/log,
> /var/lock, and /tmp mounted as tmpfs file systems.  What I propose is to run
> an init script that checks to see if the array is mounted, and if so appends
> files in the aforementioned directories to existing directories on the array
> and then remounts and binds the directories on the array.  The stop call in
> the script will reverse the process so the system can shutdown or so I can
> take the array offline after booting for maintenance.  Is this unwise?  Am I
> missing something crucial that might cause the system to blow up?

Sounds reasonably sane.

After the bind mount you would need to make sure any process with a file
open in one of those directories re-opens the file.  So you might want to
restart syslogd.

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-05  6:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-04 22:28 Is this stupid? Leslie Rhorer
2011-12-05  6:01 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-12-05  7:42   ` Leslie Rhorer
2011-12-05  6:18 ` Doug Dumitru
2011-12-05  8:01   ` Leslie Rhorer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111205170114.49cf7437@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrhorer@satx.rr.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox