From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Spin down
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 15:39:23 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111206153923.203df175@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF78GY0u89KvZhEZQ64GxWeDpBCT6cdAJ+xaGm=z7O_2gKTYTA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1897 bytes --]
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:49:03 +0100 Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:11 AM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> > 5 seconds suggests a bitmap update. Do you have an internal bitmap?
>
> I don't, but I enabled it on those arrays before with default delay.
> I then removed it when I suspected (with help of block_dump) it to
> cause spin-ups, and I noticed an improvement. Recently, the machine
> was restarted (once on 3.0 kernel, and again to update to 3.1), and
> after both restarts those 5s periodic writes occurred.
>
> > Then try adding it back with a longer delay
> > mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --bitmap=internal --delay=60
>
> Adding bitmaps on both arrays (md0 and md1), 5s periodic writes disappear.
> Removing bitmaps seems to preserve the improvement.
>
> Could the delay setting have survived on-disk and be used when
> initializing the array, but cleared when mdadm later disables bitmap
> usage ?
>
> > What kernel version are you running?
>
> 3.1.4, according to dpkg:
> ii linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64 3.1.4-1
> Linux 3.1 for 64-bit PCs
>
> Regards,
Hmm... I cannot reproduce this which makes it harder.
Can you enable dynamic debugging on md?
Make sure CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG is set, mount debugfs on /sys/kernel/debug and
echo module md_mod +p > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control
then look for extra messages in the kernel logs, starting "md:" most likely.
You'll almost certainly see something like
[ 1851.559629] md: waking up MD thread md0_raid1.
[ 1851.625819] md: updating md0 RAID superblock on device (in sync 1)
[ 1851.656878] md: (write) sdb's sb offset: 8
[ 1851.656915] md: (write) sda's sb offset: 8
every 5 seconds. If you could confirm that and report if there is anything
else reported that might help.
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-06 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-03 11:23 Spin down Vincent Pelletier
2011-12-05 6:11 ` NeilBrown
2011-12-05 7:49 ` Vincent Pelletier
2011-12-06 4:39 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-12-06 8:21 ` Vincent Pelletier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111206153923.203df175@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plr.vincent@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).