From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Subject: Re: md:Badsector must in valid range of component device. Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 20:32:41 +1100 Message-ID: <20120304203241.40a407e3@notabene.brown> References: <201203011906162346140@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/p/oqJ4V8uIsb5bZnSSR/LAf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201203011906162346140@gmail.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: majianpeng Cc: linux-raid List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/p/oqJ4V8uIsb5bZnSSR/LAf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 19:11:16 +0800 "majianpeng" wrote: > >From 98de4803f7ae4ad49b680db4889bbcd1534c5303 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: majianpeng > Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:49:56 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] md:Badsector must in valid range of component device. Why must bad sector be in the valid range? i.e. I don't think this patch is necessary. Thanks, NeilBrown --Sig_/p/oqJ4V8uIsb5bZnSSR/LAf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBT1M2uTnsnt1WYoG5AQLu2g//XdgicBsV3MyQZJUA48WzBsIR7K20zsYC iohUCzkUId1KJQYKBa6B1UoYthED1o/D4ovrWEO6YEpEKq+ojh+QylTd3Ub3AtWC ZBuQ6b0Vzyn9BlyDhSITnfmGxXhPwWp0ECSIWP61vCuRsdJWJAOARHgTtoPjxjgh P7eMAWJL6UsWcV7lDBVq06WIRMDy5T4thuUaVdaaF+F5SBPgi0XI35HjMUWIvx/s 5bqSJEpA2p2rWY5i1hnWmLPpg4sWT+d6q5L7C6+5xr5GIcNbMXnwRy1C0avalLQA tGH4evpM5iwz/LWbqVXOhoLHpUPGG5/N2xDM128iBsJHaZmqmIaLGHsScLSW9EeZ DJRO/wbWSHrmsETZdaeL39bihz8s8qoMnmHu86J8dqg6m8xj03+owHhpwg3H+0MA 5SvAe/69FZ8ELhcBz7KOB/3DQxQbyx49XUWLSeRiVbllhVPnc/tZ7C1sqs5HnhXH T8yj+HHVZVzqBD70S/6SjsLQBA3Zw9hroajZISBpfCq4tWztASWNSCEB98fCYF05 bDfeAiL1EL7dsaibYbcQItMgWZfebLXEtY0ZYvFqXWy+t6Ob1ye7CqogneGTCCbq Yn1s4onegXdmw0XD4GBwwtEEqbSpEEe+Wmn9zBBAqi8qb8WyfIPTX25HxMHfhFqQ rjMIkr2Vs4M= =ESJa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/p/oqJ4V8uIsb5bZnSSR/LAf--