From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
neilb@suse.de, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] blk: add plug for blkdev_issue_discard
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:14:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120313171414.GJ29169@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq1vcm8a0ud.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:04:58PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Vivek" == Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> writes:
>
> Vivek> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:04:18AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> >> In raid 0 case, a big discard request is divided into several small
> >> requests in chunk_size unit. Such requests can be merged in low layer
> >> if we have correct plug added. This should improve the performance a
> >> little bit.
>
> Vivek> Martin posted a patch to remove the support for allowing merging
> Vivek> of discard requests. But this seems to be a reasonable use case
> Vivek> for allowing mering discard requests. CCing Martin.
>
> Merging discard requests is hard given how we need to prepare the
> command payload at the bottom of the stack. The current upstream merge
> code pretends to be working but it actually doesn't. That's why I want
> it dead and buried.
>
> I have some changes pending (that I need for the REQ_COPY support) that
> will make merging of non-rw requests easier to deal with. But that's a
> kernel release cycle away...
So first we will get rid of mering discard request and then enable after
one release cycle once REQ_COPY support is in?
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-13 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-12 3:04 [patch 0/7] Add TRIM support for raid linear/0/1/10 Shaohua Li
2012-03-12 3:04 ` [patch 1/7] block: makes bio_split support bio without data Shaohua Li
2012-03-12 3:04 ` [patch 2/7] md: linear supports TRIM Shaohua Li
2012-03-12 3:04 ` [patch 3/7] md: raid 0 " Shaohua Li
2012-03-12 3:04 ` [patch 4/7] md: raid 1 " Shaohua Li
2012-03-12 3:04 ` [patch 5/7] md: raid 10 " Shaohua Li
2012-03-12 3:04 ` [patch 6/7] blk: add plug for blkdev_issue_discard Shaohua Li
2012-03-13 15:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-13 17:04 ` Martin K. Petersen
2012-03-13 17:14 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2012-03-13 17:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2012-03-12 3:04 ` [patch 7/7] blk: use correct sectors limitation for discard request Shaohua Li
2012-03-13 16:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-12 3:18 ` [patch 0/7] Add TRIM support for raid linear/0/1/10 Roberto Spadim
2012-03-12 18:22 ` Holger Kiehl
[not found] ` <4F5EFEB6.4060402@kernel.org>
2012-03-13 12:22 ` Holger Kiehl
2012-03-13 14:15 ` Shaohua Li
2012-03-13 14:58 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-03-13 15:44 ` Holger Kiehl
2012-03-14 1:30 ` Shaohua Li
2012-03-14 10:25 ` Holger Kiehl
2012-03-14 11:14 ` Shaohua Li
2012-03-14 11:32 ` Shaohua Li
2012-03-14 21:01 ` Holger Kiehl
2012-03-14 21:13 ` Holger Kiehl
2012-03-15 2:39 ` Shaohua Li
2012-03-15 9:08 ` Holger Kiehl
2012-03-16 2:19 ` Shaohua Li
[not found] ` <4F5EA8E9.5010502@fusionio.com>
2012-03-14 2:25 ` NeilBrown
2012-03-14 2:24 ` NeilBrown
2012-03-14 2:47 ` Shaohua Li
2012-03-17 18:14 ` Mark Lord
2012-03-18 2:03 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120313171414.GJ29169@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=shli@fusionio.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).