From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Chris Francy <zoredache@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Array Size differences between mdadm --detail and --examine
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:52:11 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120320125211.27ad32b9@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM8ZctUH--UJmKi56UJNmDss67uzQycLyx1tP0qeyB9GCFBc0g@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2328 bytes --]
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:04:34 -0700 Chris Francy <zoredache@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am seeing a different array size with mdadm --detail and --examine,
> and I don't understand why.
>
> I have seen this on a production systems, but I created an array in a
> VM for testing purposes, and I am seeing the same results.
>
> I have a 5 device RAID10 with created like so. It has 5 members 8GB
> each. Which I believe should result in an array size of ~20GB.
>
> mdadm -v --create /dev/md0 --assume-clean \
> --level=raid10 --layout=o2 --raid-devices=5 \
> --chunk=64 \
> /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdc2 /dev/sdd2 /dev/sde2 /dev/sdf2
>
> mdadm --detail reports an array size of ~20GiB
>
> root@debian:~# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
> /dev/md0:
> Creation Time : Fri Mar 16 16:06:09 2012
> Raid Level : raid10
> Array Size : 20960960 (19.99 GiB 21.46 GB)
> Used Dev Size : 8384384 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)
>
> mdadm --examine reports an array size of ~16GiB
>
> root@debian:~# mdadm --examine /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdd2 /dev/sde2 /dev/sdf2
> /dev/sdb2:
> Avail Dev Size : 16769024 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)
> Array Size : 33537536 (15.99 GiB 17.17 GB)
> Used Dev Size : 16768768 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)
Thanks for the report.
There seems to be a rounding error in mdadm when calculating the size to
report for --examine. The value for --detail is of course correct.
I'll try to get it fixed in the next release.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> Most of my testing was done on a Debian squeeze system, but I manually
> compiled and installed mdadm 3.2.3 and I also saw the same confusing
> output from a Gentoo based livecd with a recent kernel.
>
> The full output of the mdadm output is pasted available here.
> http://paste.debian.net/160057/
>
> The array in the VM seems to work fine, I was able to create a
> filesystem and store data on it. But the output from the --examine is
> confusing.
>
> The same is true with the use Dev size `8384384 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)`
> versus `16768768 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)`.
>
> Chris Francy
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-20 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-19 23:04 Array Size differences between mdadm --detail and --examine Chris Francy
2012-03-20 1:52 ` NeilBrown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120320125211.27ad32b9@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zoredache@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).